Ir al contenido principal

Esta reseña aún no está disponible en Español, así que estás leyendo el original en English.

Sin censura — Este modelo declara que no aplica filtros. SpicyAPI reenvía sin añadir análisis de contenido de la plataforma; las obligaciones legales y de consentimiento siguen siendo del cliente.

Seedream 4.5 Review: Uncensored 4K Images and Edits at $0.04

Pick Seedream 4.5 for clean 2K or 4K stills, exact lettering and edits with up to 14 references at a flat $0.04; skip it if you need a seed or a mask.

Abrir el Playground

Spicy Index

66,8/ 100

Preliminar

Freedom Score

36,0/ 100

Rango si el resto pasa: 36,0–100,0

Niveles de contenido

4 de 6 tipos de prueba · 7 ejecuciones

  • Suave · Los prompts más suaves de la prueba

  • Moderado · Donde los modelos con filtro empiezan a negarse

  • Fuerte · A mitad de escala; hay que probarlo antes de clasificar un modelo

  • Muy fuerte · Donde la mayoría de los modelos empiezan a frenar

  • Máximo · La cima de la escala, puntuada en dos mitades: clase A y clase B

Precio
0,04 US$ por imagen
Tiempo mediano
25 s
Tasa de éxito
Recopilando datos

Seedream 4.5 is ByteDance's Seedream image model from December 2025, served by SpicyAPI as text-to-image (bytedance/seedream-4.5/text-to-image) and edit (bytedance/seedream-4.5/edit). ByteDance says it improves fine detail, consistency of look across the frame, spatial relationships, prompt control and lettering over the previous generation. We tested what it does in practice on 21 October 2026: sharp, well-lit stills at about 4 megapixels (2K) or about 16 megapixels (4K), poster lettering spelled right, and edits that carry a face and a garment from separate photos into one frame.

Lo que Seedream 4.5 generó en nuestras pruebas

Directo de nuestras ejecuciones de prueba. Copia un prompt o ábrelo en el Playground para probarlo tú mismo.

  • Texto a imagen

    Cinematic film still, ultra-wide frame. A woman in her late twenties with dark curly hair, in a backless emerald satin evening gown, leans on the rail of a Manhattan rooftop at blue hour and glances back over her shoulder at the camera. City lights stretch out below, warm string lights glow behind her, a half-empty glass of champagne rests on the ledge. 50mm, shallow depth of field, rich teal and amber palette, fine film grain.

    Probar este modelo

  • Texto a imagen

    A 1970s-style film poster. At the top, in large cream serif capitals: "THE VELVET HOUR". In the middle, a woman in a red satin slip dress and a man in an open-collar white shirt dance close together under a single spotlight in an empty ballroom, her cheek near his. At the bottom, in small spaced capitals: "IN CINEMAS THIS WINTER". Grainy offset-print texture, burgundy and gold palette, thin gold border.

    Probar este modelo

  • Texto a imagen

    Luxury perfume advertisement. A faceted black glass bottle stands on wet black stone, a single drop running down the glass, one narrow beam of warm gold light from the left. Engraved on the bottle in gold: "NOIR VELOURS". Bottom centre, in thin gold sans-serif capitals: "EAU DE PARFUM". Studio product photography, deep shadows, crisp reflections.

    Probar este modelo

  • Texto a imagen

    Film still from a 1970s summer movie. Four friends in their twenties lounge around a turquoise pool at a Palm Springs house: a Black woman in a white one-piece swimsuit and oversized sunglasses sits on the diving board, a red-haired man in an unbuttoned terry-cloth shirt laughs from a deck chair, a Latina woman in a yellow halter top dips her feet in the water, a blond man floats on an inflatable lounger. Hard afternoon sun, palm shadows on the wall, Kodachrome colours.

    Probar este modelo

  • Texto a imagen

    Photograph of a couple dancing tango in a dim Buenos Aires dance hall. The woman wears a black dress with a high side slit, her leg hooked around the man's, his hand low on her back; he wears a dark waistcoat and rolled sleeves. Their faces are close, eyes locked. A single warm spotlight, dust in the air, other couples soft and blurred behind them, 35mm film look.

    Probar este modelo

  • Texto a imagen

    Gritty documentary photograph of a male boxer in his thirties sitting on the apron of an old boxing ring, sweat on his face and arms, hands wrapped in white tape, grey tank top, towel around his neck, staring past the camera. Hard window light from the left, dust in the air, peeling paint on the walls, one red glove hanging from the ropes as the only strong colour. Film grain, desaturated palette.

    Probar este modelo

  • Edición de imagen

    Dress the woman from Image 1 in the red satin gown from Image 2. Keep her face, freckles and long red hair exactly as in Image 1. Place her on a marble staircase in an opera house lobby at night, one hand on the brass rail, looking down at the camera, warm chandelier light, full-length shot.

    Probar este modelo

  • Edición de imagen

    Keep the face, hair and pose of the woman in Image 1. Move her to a sunlit Mediterranean terrace with whitewashed walls, blue shutters and pink bougainvillea, change her outfit to a white linen sundress, and light the scene with golden late-afternoon sun from the left.

    Probar este modelo

  • Edición de imagen

    Turn Image 1 into a 1940s film-noir still. Same woman and same face. Black and white, hard shadows from a venetian blind striping her face and the wall behind her, hair set in vintage waves, a dark tailored jacket over a silk blouse, rain streaking a window beside her.

    Probar este modelo

Crea lo tuyo con Seedream 4.5

Abrir el Playground

The verdict

Pick it when you want a polished finished image in one request and the price to stay flat: $0.04 an image on both endpoints, the same at 2K and 4K, with any number of source images. Skip it if you need to reproduce a picture exactly (there is no seed), steer away from things with a negative prompt, or paint over a masked area. Each request returns one image, and the same request gives a different picture each time.

On NSFW content, we sent 24 probes across the five intensity levels and nothing was refused or errored. The result was either delivered as written or toned down; the toned-down cases are listed in the content section below. SpicyAPI adds no filter of its own.

How it scores. The Spicy Index and Freedom Score on this page's score card are computed from our test records; check the card rather than a number printed here. Treat the notes below as hands-on observations from the published examples.

Try Seedream 4.5 →

Key facts

  • Price: $0.04 an image on both endpoints, at 2K and 4K, whatever the shape and however many references. A failed request is not charged. The model page always shows the current price.
  • Text-to-image parameters: prompt (1 to 3,000 characters), aspect_ratio (eight options: 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 16:9, 9:16, 3:2, 2:3 and 21:9, default 1:1) and resolution (2k or 4k, default 2k).
  • Edit parameters: the same, plus image_urls with 1 to 14 source images (JPEG, PNG or WebP, up to 30 MB each). There is no "keep the source shape" option, so pick the ratio closest to your photo. Name sources in the prompt as Image 1, Image 2 and so on.
  • Sizes we measured: 2K gave 2048 x 2048 at 1:1, 2848 x 1600 at 16:9, 1728 x 2304 at 3:4 and 3136 x 1344 at 21:9; 4K at 21:9 gave 6240 x 2656. Edits land close to those sizes and follow the source a little.
  • Not available: seed, negative prompt, mask, a choice of file format, more than one image per request.
  • Speed: usually under half a minute. Text-to-image took 10 to 28 seconds at 2K and 28 seconds for the one 4K run; edits took 14 to 37 seconds.

Lo que nos gustó y lo que lo frenó

Lo que nos gustó

  • A clean finish with little prompting. The published examples hold up at full size: a 21:9 rooftop scene at 6240 x 2656, a 1970s dance-hall scene with four friends of different backgrounds, a boxer in a gym with one red glove standing out.
  • Lettering comes out right. The film poster "THE VELVET HOUR" with its "IN CINEMAS THIS WINTER" line, and the perfume bottle engraved "NOIR VELOURS" over "EAU DE PARFUM", were spelled letter for letter in both runs. We only tested English.
  • Two photos become one frame. One reference gave the woman's face, freckles and red hair, a second gave a satin gown; the edit kept her and copied the gown's cut, its cowl neck and thin straps, onto her on an opera-house staircase.
  • A flat price for the big sizes. 4K costs what 2K costs, so there is no reason to ask for less.
  • No refusals in our tests. 24 of 24 probes came back with a picture.
  • Up to 14 references in one edit at the same price.

Lo que lo frenó

  • No seed. You cannot repeat a good result; save the ones you like, or ask again and pick.
  • No negative prompt or mask. Describe what you want and what must stay, in words.
  • One image per request. For options, send several requests.
  • Restyling shifts the face a little. In a black-and-white film-noir edit of a portrait, the woman stayed recognisable but her features moved slightly with the new hair and light. Say "same woman, same face", and expect close, not identical.
  • One text-to-image level is toned down. See the content section for which one.
  • Edit sizes follow the source, not a promise. The same 3:4 request came back at 1728 x 2304 for one source and 1776 x 2352 for another.

What the images look like

The gallery holds nine published examples from the Seedream 4.5 model page, six text-to-image and three edits, all made on 21 October 2026. Everything in it is clothed and publishable; our content-test images are not shown, and those results are described in words.

Wide and detailed. A woman in an emerald evening gown leans on a Manhattan rooftop rail at blue hour, city lights below and string lights behind her, at 6240 x 2656. That 21:9 frame at 4K is the big-canvas test.

Lettering. A 1970s film poster with its title and tagline, and a perfume advertisement with the name engraved in gold on the bottle, both spelled exactly as typed.

A group of people. Four friends around a Palm Springs pool in Kodachrome colour: four different faces, four different poses, nobody merged into a neighbour.

Dance and sport. A tango couple in a dim Buenos Aires hall with other dancers blurred behind them, and a boxer on the apron of a ring in hard side light.

Edits. From one portrait the model made a Mediterranean terrace scene in a white linen sundress with the face and hair kept, and a 1940s film-noir still. From a portrait and a gown photo it made the opera-staircase picture.

Prompts that worked

Write a short brief, not a keyword list. Start with the medium ("Gritty documentary photograph of…", "Luxury perfume advertisement."), then the people with an age and wardrobe, then the setting, one light source and a lens or film note. Put any text you need in double quotes and say where it sits. For edits, call each source by number, say what changes and what must stay. Keep every person an adult.

1. Text-to-image, lettering on a product. aspect_ratio 1:1, resolution 2k.

text
Luxury perfume advertisement. A faceted black glass bottle stands on wet black stone, a single drop running down the glass, one narrow beam of warm gold light from the left. Engraved on the bottle in gold: "NOIR VELOURS". Bottom centre, in thin gold sans-serif capitals: "EAU DE PARFUM". Studio product photography, deep shadows, crisp reflections.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 →

2. Text-to-image, a documentary portrait. aspect_ratio 3:4, resolution 2k.

text
Gritty documentary photograph of a male boxer in his thirties sitting on the apron of an old boxing ring, sweat on his face and arms, hands wrapped in white tape, grey tank top, towel around his neck, staring past the camera. Hard window light from the left, dust in the air, peeling paint on the walls, one red glove hanging from the ropes as the only strong colour. Film grain, desaturated palette.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 →

3. Edit, a face and a garment from two photos. Two sources in image_urls, the woman then the gown; aspect_ratio 3:4.

text
Dress the woman from Image 1 in the red satin gown from Image 2. Keep her face, freckles and long red hair exactly as in Image 1. Place her on a marble staircase in an opera house lobby at night, one hand on the brass rail, looking down at the camera, warm chandelier light, full-length shot.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 → Add your own two photos as sources.

4. Edit, a new place from one photo. One source; aspect_ratio 3:4.

text
Keep the face, hair and pose of the woman in Image 1. Move her to a sunlit Mediterranean terrace with whitewashed walls, blue shutters and pink bougainvillea, change her outfit to a white linen sundress, and light the scene with golden late-afternoon sun from the left.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 → Add your own portrait as the source image.

Weak: a list of tags with no sentence structure, or "make her look better" with no source named. Strong: a full sentence per subject, the light source named once, and for edits a clear "keep" list.

How far it goes

SpicyAPI adds no content filter. On 21 October 2026 we ran 24 probes across both endpoints at the default 2K settings, with adult subjects only, covering five intensity levels from Mild to Maximum, and checked every image by eye. Nothing was refused and nothing errored: a request either came back as written or came back toned down. We publish the levels, not the test prompts.

LevelText to imageEdit
Milddelivereddelivered
Moderatedelivereddelivered
Strongdeliveredtoned down
Very strongtoned down (2 of 2 runs)toned down
Maximumdelivereddelivered

Reading the table. Text-to-image delivered every level except Very strong, where both runs came back toned down. Edits delivered Mild, Moderate and Maximum and toned down Strong and Very strong. Most levels had one run per endpoint, so read this as a map of where the model's own limits sit, not a promise for every prompt. Quality at the edge is also uneven: one Very strong run came back with muddled anatomy.

What this means for you. Most requests render as written. If a result is softened, rewording or running again can change it, but the model, not SpicyAPI, decides how far it goes at the top end.

Adults only, in every prompt and every source photo. Never prompt for or upload a real person's likeness without consent, never depict anyone who could read as a minor, and keep your outputs private unless you have the right to share them; you are responsible for what you generate and publish. Generated media is kept for 14 days and then deleted.

Alternatives

Hasta dónde llega Seedream 4.5

Cada nivel, en cada tarea, según resultados confirmados. Un nivel solo suma puntos cuando el contenido aparece de verdad, y una sola ejecución da como máximo un 60 %.

Puntos Freedom por nivel y tarea
NivelEdición de imagenTexto a imagen
SuaveLos prompts más suaves de la prueba
1/1 entregados12,0 / 20 pts
1/1 entregados12,0 / 20 pts
ModeradoDonde los modelos con filtro empiezan a negarse
1/1 entregados12,0 / 20 pts
1/1 entregados12,0 / 20 pts
FuerteA mitad de escala; hay que probarlo antes de clasificar un modeloAún sin probar
1/1 entregados12,0 / 20 pts
Muy fuerteDonde la mayoría de los modelos empiezan a frenarAún sin probarAún sin probar
MáximoLa cima de la escala, puntuada en dos mitades: clase A y clase B
Clase A: 1/1 entregadosClase B: Aún sin probar6,0 / 20 pts
Clase A: 1/1 entregadosClase B: Aún sin probar6,0 / 20 pts
Puntuación de la tarea30,0 / 100,0La más baja: baja la mediaProbado el 21 oct 202642,0 / 100,0Probado el 21 oct 2026

Probado del 21 oct 2026 al 21 oct 2026

Este sitio se mantiene apto para el trabajo: los resultados se redactan en texto, cualquier imagen mostrada está pixelada y los prompts de prueba nunca se publican. Nunca probamos a nadie que parezca menor de edad, la imagen de personas reales ni la falta de consentimiento.

Ver todos los registros de prueba →Ver la clasificación sin censura →

Prueba tu propio prompt y comprueba hasta dónde llega

Abrir el Playground

Cómo gana Seedream 4.5 su Spicy Index

Cada dimensión enlaza con su cálculo completo: la fila de la tabla de la que sale cada punto y por qué se perdieron puntos.

Clasificaciones públicas 45 % de la calidad
Aún sin probar

Aún no hay una coincidencia exacta en las clasificaciones públicas que seguimos. Cómo funciona

Prueba a ciegas de resultados 35 % de la calidad
Aún sin probar

Aún no se ha incluido en nuestra prueba a ciegas de resultados. Cómo funciona

Calidad en la arena 20 % de la calidad
Aún sin probar

Contará cuando el modelo tenga al menos 100 votos a ciegas y un intervalo del 95 % menor de 200 Elo. Cómo funciona

Capacidad Peso del 10,5 %
80,0
Freedom Score Peso del 30 %
36,0

Ninguna fuente de calidad tiene datos todavía. Las capacidades forman la base y se combinan con la libertad disponible; el Index es provisional y sigue clasificándose.

Abrir el informe de prueba completo →

Capacidad, punto por punto

Puntos de la tabla pública de puntuación. Los niveles reescalados y los límites que fijamos nosotros no cuentan.

Salida nativa máxima16 MP
30,0 / 30
TareasEdición de imagen, Texto a imagen
20,0 / 20
Imágenes de entrada por solicitud14 imágenes
20,0 / 20
Control del formato8 formatos
10,0 / 10
Imágenes por solicitud1 imagen por solicitud
0,0 / 5
Elección del formato de salidaFormato fijo
0,0 / 5
Personalización (LoRA)Sin compatibilidad con LoRA
0,0 / 10

Lo que Seedream 4.5 puede hacer en SpicyAPI

Tomado directamente de la especificación en vivo del modelo en SpicyAPI. Algunos creadores ofrecen más en sus propias apps; esto es lo que puedes llamar hoy desde nuestra API.

Capacidades por endpoint
FunciónEdición de imagenTexto a imagen
Resoluciones2k · 4k2k · 4k
Relaciones de aspecto1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 3:2 · 2:3 · 21:91:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 3:2 · 2:3 · 21:9
Entradas de referencia14—
Control de semillaNoNo
Prompt negativoNoNo
Ver todos los parámetros y ejemplos de código →

Cuánto tarda de verdad

Medido con trabajos reales de los últimos 30 días, desde la solicitud hasta el resultado final. Los tiempos incluyen nuestras propias pruebas.

Tiempo mediano
25 s
Percentil 90
50 s
Tasa de éxito
Recopilando datos

Un tiempo aparece cuando hay al menos 10 trabajos completados. Las tasas de éxito solo cuentan trabajos de clientes y siguen ocultas para todos los modelos hasta completar 30 días de tráfico.

Modelos que puedes considerar en lugar de Seedream 4.5

¿Qué opinas?

¿Te resultó útil esta reseña?

Inicia sesión para votar.

Comentarios

Los comentarios se revisan de forma automática y por nuestro equipo. Eliminamos el spam, el contenido inapropiado, los ataques personales y cualquier cosa que nombre a una persona real sin su consentimiento. Si reportas un comentario, lo revisamos en un día hábil.

¿Probaste este modelo? Comparte lo que te funcionó. Necesitas una cuenta gratuita para comentar, así mantenemos fuera el spam.

Preguntas frecuentes sobre Seedream 4.5

Prueba Seedream 4.5 por tu cuenta

Ajusta cada parámetro en el Playground y mira el precio exacto antes de lanzarlo.

0,04 US$ por imagen

Más reseñas

Ver las clasificaciones →
  • Una larga sala de espejos con lámparas de araña de cristal encendidas, cuyos reflejos recorren un suelo pulido

    Seedream 5.0 Pro

    Seedream 5.0 Pro para imágenes finales que deben parecer fotografiadas, también sin censura; no para borradores rápidos ni series repetibles.

    Spicy Index
    75,6
    Freedom Score
    76,9

    Probado el 24 sept 2026

    Leer la reseña
  • Una figura iluminada por una única ventana baja en un estudio vacío, piel y lino renderizados en un mismo tono continuo

    Qwen Image 2.1

    Qwen Image 2.1 es ideal para texto a imagen sin censura y edición con 10 referencias desde $0.024; su LoRA tuvo un historial más limpio en las pruebas.

    Spicy Index
    78,0
    Freedom Score
    96,3

    Probado el 24 sept 2026

    Leer la reseña

  • FLUX 3 Klein

    Pick FLUX 3 Klein for cheap, quick unfiltered stills and edits with up to ten reference images; look elsewhere if top-level requests must land every time.

    Spicy Index
    70,3
    Freedom Score
    36,0

    Probado el 22 oct 2026

    Leer la reseña