Model comparisons
LTX 2.5: Uncensored. Wan 2.2: Softened. Only LTX 2.5 returns audio in the same file as the video. Tier prices, request fields and limits side by side.
LTX 2.5 image-to-video from Lightricks animates an opening frame into a clip of 5 to 20 seconds, optionally landing on a closing frame you set. Render at 720p, 1080p, 2K or 4K, with a generated soundtrack on every clip.
View model details →View sample outputs →Alibaba's Wan 2.2 image-to-video animates one opening frame into a silent five-second clip at 480p or 720p. The frame fixes subject, wardrobe, set and light, while a required prompt carries the motion.
View model details →View sample outputs →Compare
Start with the input you have, the result you want and your budget. These are the differences that affect that choice.
Compare the published examples, then try the same input on both models with matching settings.
The Spicy Index and Freedom Score for both models, from the same daily calculation as the leaderboards.
| Measure | LTX 2.5 | Wan 2.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Spicy Index | 66.1 | 35.3 |
| Freedom Score | 82.3 | 43.1 |
| Evidence | Tested 5 of 6 probe types · 27 runs | Tested 6 of 6 probe types · 38 runs |
| Range if the rest pass | 82.3–98.3 | 43.1–43.1 |
| Price | $0.45 per 5-second clip | $0.48 per clip |
| Reviews | Read the LTX 2.5 review | Read the Wan 2.2 review |
Preliminary · limited independent quality evidence
See both on the leaderboard →Current price
A start price answers a different question than the one you have. These are the tiers both models publish, matched setting for setting, in US dollars per billed unit with no conversion step in between.
These two bill on different tiers, so there is no row to line up. Each one's own published tiers are listed here instead.
LTX 2.5: 720p $0.09 / output seconds · 1080p $0.13 / output seconds · 2K $0.19 / output seconds · 4K $0.3 / output seconds
Wan 2.2: 480p $0.24 / requests · 720p $0.48 / requests
Arithmetic on the published rates at each model's own default setting, not a quote. The console prices your actual settings before a request is accepted.
About this comparison
Every row here is read from the JSON Schema the endpoint validates against, so it matches what the API will really accept rather than a feature list written by hand.
Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.
| Controls and limits | LTX 2.5 | Wan 2.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Supported tasks | image-to-video | image-to-video |
| Clip length | 5–20 seconds | Not offered |
| Resolution tiers | 720p · 1080p · 2K · 4K | 480p · 720p |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| High-resolution tier | Yes | No |
| Seed | Yes | Yes |
| Negative prompt | No | Yes |
| Execution | Submit, then poll or take the callback | Submit, then poll or take the callback |
| Request timeout | 120 minutes | 60 minutes |
| Availability | Live | Live |
Do low-filter models allow every request?
Two separate facts sit behind these labels. The first is what we do, which is nothing: no platform content filter, and no maturity flag to set on a request. The second is what each model does on its own, and that is the only part that varies between these two.
LTX 2.5
This model declares no content filter. SpicyAPI forwards the request without adding a platform content scan; legal and consent duties remain with the customer.
Wan 2.2
This model returns a result instead of an error, but requests beyond its own limits come back toned down. The call still succeeds and is still billed, so check the output rather than the status code.
Usage note Use only authorised material. Do not create sexual content involving minors, non-consensual intimate imagery, or deceptive impersonation of a real person.
Use these content labels to shortlist models, then open each model page for available examples and content-test details.
The label never changes your obligations. Age, consent, real-person likeness and the law where you operate stay with you, and SpicyAPI does not inspect each request.
Can I swap the model ID without changing the request body?
The task lifecycle is shared; the body is not. Each endpoint publishes its own JSON Schema and the API validates against that, so this is the list to reconcile before a switch.
How to choose
LTX 2.5 supports clips up to 20 seconds.
LTX 2.5 returns a soundtrack in the same file as the picture; the other returns picture only, so audio has to be added afterwards.
LTX 2.5 supports a high-resolution option.
Compare
The model identifiers are lightricks/ltx-2.5/image-to-video and alibaba/wan-2.2/image-to-video, and both go in the same field of the same request.
Both run the same way: submit the task, then poll it or take the callback. Queueing and retry logic carry over unchanged.
Both use the same submit-and-track flow, but their required inputs may differ. Check each model page before switching.
One key, one balance, one set of spend caps. Both bill to the same account in US dollars, and the per-key daily, monthly and lifetime limits apply to whichever one you call.
Questions developers ask
The two bill on different tiers, so there is no like-for-like row: LTX 2.5 starts at $0.09 / output seconds and Wan 2.2 at $0.24 / requests. Prices may change; check the estimate shown for your actual settings before submitting.
LTX 2.5 allows 120 minutes per task and Wan 2.2 allows 60. Those are ceilings rather than typical times — most requests finish far sooner — but they are what your own client timeout has to survive.
Prices and capabilities shown here come from the current public model catalogue. Check each model page for its latest inputs and examples.
Related comparisons