Skip to main content

Gemini 2.5 Flash is Google's hybrid reasoning model as an OpenAI-compatible chat endpoint. It reads up to 1,048,576 tokens and replies up to 65,535, with three reasoning-effort levels, up to 128 tools and text, image, video and audio input.

Input $0.285Output $2.375per 1 million tokens5% below the publisher's list priceCached input $0.0285Google official priceInput $0.30Output $2.50

Workbench

Gemini 2.5 Flash

What can Gemini 2.5 Flash help with?

Related models and next tasks

Missing the model you need?

Tell us what to add and where you would use it. Requests go to the people who decide what gets onboarded next.

Build stable message flows for a long read and a short answer at a low rate

Gemini 2.5 Flash reads up to 1,048,576 tokens and returns up to 65,536, with reasoning_effort at low, medium or high and a temperature range that goes to 2. It is the cheapest million-token route in the Gemini group here, which makes it the default for work where the input is large and the answer is not.

Open the chat playground
Build stable message flows for a long read and a short answer at a low rate
Model
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Good for
a long read and a short answer at a low rate
Message shape
System rules → evidence and state → current task → output contract
Fact boundary
Capabilities, controls, and price come from the live schema

Integration principle

Validate with the smallest message set, then add necessary context. Separate facts, assumptions, and constraints, and design interruption, retry, settlement, and review paths.

Build repeatable workflows for a long read and a short answer at a low rate

Gemini 2.5 Flash reads up to 1,048,576 tokens and returns up to 65,536, with reasoning_effort at low, medium or high and a temperature range that goes to 2. It is the cheapest million-token route in the Gemini group here, which makes it the default for work where the input is large and the answer is not.

  • Asymmetric by design

    A million in, 65,536 out

    The shape suits reading rather than writing: summarise, classify or answer against a large body of text.

  • Temperature up to 2

    Wider than the Claude routes here

    The Gemini routes accept a temperature range twice as wide, which matters if you deliberately sample above 1.

  • Effort and sampling together

    reasoning_effort plus temperature and top_p

    Unlike the Claude routes, which expose one or the other, this group gives you both on the same call.

Where Gemini 2.5 Flash wins on task cost and interaction shape

Test one real task for quality, verifiability, latency, and sale-price fit instead of relying on a general leaderboard.

  1. Choose 2.5 Flash

    Large inputs, ordinary answers

    The lowest rate here for a full million-token window.

  2. Choose 3.7 Flash

    You want the newer generation

    Same window and ceiling at a higher rate; compare on your own cases rather than on version numbers.

  3. Choose 3.1 Pro Preview

    The task is genuinely hard

    A higher rate and a long-context tier, with a lower 32,768-token reply ceiling.

Turn Gemini 2.5 Flash into concrete work, not generic labels

Every scenario needs input boundaries, verification, and recovery; official capabilities, benchmarks, and tool support are never invented.

  • One large corpus, many short questions

    Document question answering

    One large corpus, many short questions

    Cache the corpus prefix and vary only the question.

  • Long inputs, fixed-length outputs

    Bulk summarisation

    Long inputs, fixed-length outputs

    The asymmetric shape is exactly this workload.

  • Decisions that need the whole document

    Classification over long context

    Decisions that need the whole document

    response_format keeps the verdict machine-readable.

  • Adult characters, clear boundaries

    Unrestricted narrative work

    Adult characters, clear boundaries

    Long session history stays in context at a rate that makes it practical. We add no content filter; what the model itself declines is its own behaviour.

Organize context into an inspectable Gemini 2.5 Flash input

Objective, evidence, state, constraints, and output contract need distinct jobs so requests can be compressed, debugged, and reproduced.

  1. Caching

    Stable corpus, variable question

    Cached input is a tenth of fresh input. Put the corpus first and the question last.

  2. Effort

    Start low on high-volume traffic

    Reasoning tokens bill as output; on a route chosen for its rate, effort is where the saving leaks.

  3. Sampling

    Remember the range is 0 to 2

    A value that was aggressive on a 0-to-1 route is mid-range here.

  4. Output

    Design for 65,536

    The window is large but the reply is not; ask for a bounded deliverable.

Prove a repeatable Gemini 2.5 Flash case before product integration

Confirm live schema, quote, streaming, and error behavior before reusing the normalized request.

  1. 01 · Baseline

    Validate the smallest request in Playground

    Check message layers, output shape, streaming, and current controls.

  2. 02 · Boundaries

    Exercise failure, cancellation, and retry

    Verify timeouts, interrupted streams, oversized input, regeneration, and duplicate submission.

  3. 03 · Integrate

    Copy the normalized API request

    Use the public model id and messages contract; read model controls from the live schema.

  4. 04 · Operate

    Meter usage and keep evaluating

    Store state, final usage, failure reasons, and quality feedback; quote expensive calls first.

Bring Gemini 2.5 Flash into a clear API contract

Playground, API examples, request states, and usage records stay aligned from evaluation through production integration.

  • Unified contract

    One shape for messages, streams, and errors

    Keep request structure, state handling, and error recovery consistent when changing models.

  • Live schema

    Use the current endpoint controls

    Playground and API examples expose available fields, limits, and default behavior together.

  • Observable lifecycle

    Every request has a clear state

    Submission, streaming, failure, cancellation, and usage use inspectable public semantics.

  • Portable integration

    Reduce work when models evolve

    A clear contract keeps product code focused on inputs, results, and user experience.

Gemini 2.5 Flash API boundaries to confirm before integration

All Gemini models8