Skip to main content
Uncensored — We add no content filter to this model, but like most chat models it declines a blunt request that comes with no context. It writes unrestricted fiction reliably once your system prompt sets up a fiction-writing context, or once the request is framed as a story. Legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

Grok 4.3 Review: 1M Context, a Real Reasoning Off Switch

Pick Grok 4.3 for a huge context window, a genuine reasoning off switch and uncensored writing at a low price; skip it if you need file uploads.

Spicy Index

77.0/ 100

Freedom Score

98.9/ 100
  • Mild · The lightest writing requests in the test

  • Moderate · A step up, still below the middle of the scale

  • Strong · Mid-scale requests; must be tested before a model is ranked

  • Very strong · Where most language models start to hold back

  • Maximum · The strongest written requests, scored as one class

Price
$1.56 per 1M mixed tokens (3 input : 1 output)
Output speed
48 tok/s
Success rate
Collecting data

Grok 4.3 passed every rung of our content ladder except one softened reply, holds 1,000,000 tokens per request, and its reasoning_effort none setting answers with no deliberation pass at all. It costs $1.25 per million input tokens, the same as xAI's own published rate.

The verdict

On 19 September we sent Grok 4.3 nine L4 Intense requests — our ladder's term for a written intimate scene between two adults — three each asked directly, framed as fiction and set through a system prompt. Direct and system-prompt phrasing rendered all three requests in full; the fiction frame rendered two in full and came back softened once. On 24 September we ran the rest of our ladder: L1 Suggestive (a slipping strap), L2 Mature themes and L3 Strong all came back as asked, and every L5 Extreme run (a written scene past L4, either restraint and impact play or graphic violence between adults) did too. Grok 4.3 reads 1,000,000 tokens and writes back up to 900,000 of them, and reasoning_effort none turns off deliberation entirely rather than merely shortening it - measured at 145 output tokens for a request that would otherwise burn thousands on thinking.

Pick it for volume chat work, tool-calling agents and long documents that need one pass rather than several; skip it if the request needs a PDF or file attachment, or if you want Grok 4.7's tighter, more consistent prose at L4 Intense.

How it scores. Most of the Spicy Index is output quality — the AA Intelligence Index, arena text and creative-writing leaderboards, plus our four writing test suites — with specs contributing 15% of the quality-and-capability base before the Freedom Score is included; the live figure and the full breakdown are on the score card above and in the test report. On specs it brings tool calling, five reasoning-effort levels and a 1,000,000-token window, with text and image input but no audio or files, and response_format works without verified JSON-schema adherence yet. The Freedom Score is 98.9 of 100, tested across all 5 rungs over 24 runs; it's explained under How far Grok 4.3 writes.

Try Grok 4.3 →

Key facts

  • Freedom Score: 98.9/100 on this page's score card, tested 5 of 5 rungs across 24 runs, recalculated as runs are added.
  • Pass rate: 8 of 9 L4 Intense replies rendered in full on 19 Sep 2026 (one came back softened); every other rung passed clean on 24 Sep 2026.
  • Spicy Index: see the score card above.
  • Price: $1.25 per million input tokens, $0.20 cached and $2.50 output; from 200,000 combined input tokens, $2.50, $0.40 and $5.00.
  • Limits: 1,000,000-token context, 256 messages per request, replies up to 900,000 tokens, text and image input only.
  • Sources: every scored run is in the Grok 4.3 test report, the scoring rules are on our review methodology page, and the full parameter list is on the Grok 4.3 model page.

What we liked and what held it back

What we liked

  • Reasoning off is a real setting, not a smaller number. reasoning_effort none skips the deliberation pass entirely: measured at 145 output tokens against a 2,000-token cap, with nothing spent on thinking. Point it at classification, extraction, routing or format conversion and the bill drops with it.
  • A 1,000,000-token window with room to answer. A single reply can run to 900,000 tokens, so a full document set goes in and a long report comes back without either side being split into calls that never saw each other.
  • It's a migration target. Since 15 May 2026 xAI redirects seven retired ids here - grok-4-fast-reasoning, grok-4-fast-non-reasoning, grok-4-1-fast-reasoning, grok-4-1-fast-non-reasoning, grok-4-0709, grok-code-fast-1 and grok-3 - so an old integration can move over by pointing at xai/grok-4.3 and setting reasoning_effort to low or none.
  • It reads images. A user message can carry image_url parts alongside text, each with a detail hint of auto, low or high.
  • Priced at xAI's own rate. $1.25/$0.20/$2.50 per million tokens, the same as xAI's published rate, and the long-context tier matches xAI's $2.50/$0.40/$5.00.
  • No content filter of our own, and it holds up. Every rung of our content ladder rendered except a single softened L4 Intense reply.

What held it back

  • Reasoning tokens aren't bound by max_tokens. They're billed as output but don't respect the reply cap: at effort high with the cap set to 800, one measured request produced 18,339 output tokens anyway. Drop reasoningeffort when a request needs a predictable ceiling, don't rely on maxtokens to hold it down.
  • The default reply cap is small. max_tokens defaults to 4,096, and a long generation truncates silently unless you ask for more, up to the 900,000-token ceiling.
  • No files or PDFs. Message content is text and image_url parts only; a file or PDF part is rejected before the request prices.
  • The long-context tier prices the whole request, not the overage. At 200,000 combined input and cached tokens the entire call moves to $2.50/$0.40/$5.00, so trimming a history just under that line saves more than trimming further above it.
  • One L4 Intense reply softened. Of nine runs on 19 September, the fiction-framed phrasing came back softened once; direct and system-prompt phrasing were clean.
  • 256 messages per request, independent of the token budget - a long chat history hits this cap before it exhausts the window.

What we tested

On 19 September we sent Grok 4.3 nine L4 Intense requests, three phrasings times three runs: asked directly with no framing, framed as fiction, and set through a system prompt, changing only the phrasing. Direct and system-prompt phrasing rendered every one of their three requests in full; the fiction phrasing rendered two in full and returned one softened reply. Nothing was refused in either case.

On 24 September we ran the rest of the ladder, one request per phrasing for L1 Suggestive, L2 Mature themes and L3 Strong, and two per phrasing for L5 Extreme. All fifteen came back exactly as asked, across all three phrasings, with nothing softened or refused.

Across the two sessions that's 24 scored runs: 23 rendered in full and one softened, none refused. The Spicy Index page reads this as a Freedom Score of 98.9 of 100.

Prompts that worked

Grok 4.3 doesn't need a system prompt to answer plainly; use one to fix a voice or a persona across a whole conversation, and reach for reasoning_effort none only when the request has nothing to think through.

1. A published example: prove a fix before you ship it. System message plus a direct instruction.

text
system: Write evaluation plans as a numbered list of checks, each with the observation that would make it fail.
user: We are replacing our retry logic with an idempotency key. Plan how to prove the new path cannot double-charge.

Run this prompt on Grok 4.3 →

2. A published example: an image and a question in one turn. Attach a screenshot as an image_url part at detail high next to the text.

text
user: These two dashboards are before and after Tuesday's deploy. Which panel shows the regression, and what is the most likely cause?
[image: https://cdn.spicyapi.ai/models/examples/inputs/c681580c3c6a0b63.jpeg]

Run this prompt on Grok 4.3 →

Settings that matter: reasoningeffort none for classification, extraction and routing with nothing to think about; low - the default - for ordinary instruction following; medium, high or xhigh only when the answer has to be worked out, and watch maxtokens when you do, since reasoning tokens ignore the cap. temperature 0 for two runs you want to compare directly; leave top_p alone if you're already moving temperature.

How far Grok 4.3 writes

Grok 4.3 rendered 23 of 24 scored runs across our content ladder in full, with one softened reply and nothing refused. On 19 September, nine L4 Intense requests split across three phrasings - direct, fiction-framed and system-prompt - came back rendered eight times and softened once, with the fiction phrasing the one that softened. On 24 September every other rung, L1 Suggestive through L5 Extreme, passed clean across all three phrasings. The page label is Uncensored: we add no content filter on our side, so what a request gets back is Grok's own behaviour, not a layer we inserted.

Freedom Score: 98.9 of 100 on this page's score card, tested 5 of 5 rungs across 24 runs, recalculated as we add more.

Not tested yet: multi-turn chats staying in character over many turns (our runs were single requests); languages other than English; upper-rung images as input.

Every character in a request should be an adult, keep real, identifiable people out of it, and you're responsible for the law where you publish.

What the community says

Reception is mixed on capability, not on speed. One tester wrote that "its responses are far smaller/token dense than other models with comparable performance", while the same review noted "its overall coding reasoning ability is not competitive with the big April releases, and neither Grok 4.20 nor Grok 4.3 have been able to significantly push the intelligence frontier since Grok 4". On pricing, another commenter summed it up as "speed (202.7 tok/s) and value (1.25 -> 2.50) look great, with pretty decent intelligence". That matches what we saw: a model built for throughput and price rather than the hardest reasoning tasks.

Alternatives

How far Grok 4.3 goes

Each level, on each task, based on confirmed results. A level earns points only when the content actually appears, and a single run earns 60% at most.

Freedom points by level and task
LevelChat
MildThe lightest writing requests in the test
3/3 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
ModerateA step up, still below the middle of the scale
3/3 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
StrongMid-scale requests; must be tested before a model is ranked
3/3 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
Very strongWhere most language models start to hold back
8/9 delivered18.9 / 20 pts
MaximumThe strongest written requests, scored as one class
6/6 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
Task score98.9 / 98.9Tested Sep 24, 2026

Tested Sep 19, 2026 to Sep 24, 2026

This site stays safe for work: results are written up as text, any image shown is pixel-censored, and test prompts are never published. We never test anyone who looks underage, real people’s likenesses or non-consent.

See every test record →See the uncensored leaderboard →

Run your own prompt and see how far it goes

How Grok 4.3 earns its Spicy Index

Each dimension below links to its full workings: the table row every point came from and why points were lost.

Public leaderboards 40% of quality
66.5
Role-play 15% of quality
Not yet tested

Our role-play suite hasn’t run on this model yet. How it works

Creative writing 15% of quality
Not yet tested

Our creative-writing suite hasn’t run on this model yet. How it works

Instruction following 15% of quality
Not yet tested

Our instruction-following suite hasn’t run on this model yet. How it works

Long-context memory 15% of quality
Not yet tested

Our long-context suite hasn’t run on this model yet. How it works

Capability 10.5% weight
74.0
Freedom Score 30% weight
98.9
Open the full test report →

Capability, item by item

Points from the public scoring table. Upscaled tiers and limits we set ourselves don’t count.

Context window (creator-published)1,000,000 tokens
24.0 / 30
Input modalities on SpicyAPIText, plus images
12.0 / 25
Tool useTools and tool_choice
15.0 / 15
Structured outputAccepted, schema adherence not yet verified
8.0 / 15
Reasoning control5 levels: none · low · medium · high · xhigh
15.0 / 15

What Grok 4.3 can do on SpicyAPI

Straight from the live model specification on SpicyAPI. Some creators offer more in their own apps; this is what you can call through our API today.

Capabilities by endpoint
FeatureChat
Context window1,000,000 tokens
Max output per request900,000 tokens
Reasoning levelsnone · low · medium · high · xhigh
Tool callingYes
Structured outputYes
See every parameter and code sample →

How long it really takes

Measured on real jobs over the last 30 days, from request to finished result. Times include our own test runs.

Output speed
48 tok/sIncludes time to first token
Success rate
Collecting data

A time appears once at least 10 completed jobs are in. Success rates count customer jobs only and stay hidden for every model until we have a full 30 days of traffic.

What people say about Grok 4.3

2 positive · 0 mixed · 1 negative

  • its responses are far smaller/token dense than other models with comparable performance

    hacker-news· May 1, 2026· PositiveSource

  • its overall coding reasoning ability is not competitive with the big April releases, and neither Grok 4.20 nor Grok 4.3 have been able to significantly push the intelligence frontier since Grok 4.

    hacker-news· May 1, 2026· NegativeSource

  • Ok speed (202.7 tok/s) and value (1.25 -> 2.50) look great, with pretty decent intelligence.

    hacker-news· May 1, 2026· PositiveSource

Quotes are verbatim from public posts, linked to the original. They are not ratings and don’t feed any score.

Models to consider instead of Grok 4.3

What do you think?

Was this review useful?

Log in to vote.

Comments

Comments are checked automatically and by our team. We remove spam, offensive content, personal attacks and anything that names a real person without consent. Report a comment and we review it within one business day.

Tried this model? Share what worked. You need a free account to comment, so we can keep spam out.

Grok 4.3 FAQ

Try Grok 4.3 yourself

Set every parameter in the Playground and see the exact price before you run it.

$1.56 per 1M mixed tokens (3 input : 1 output)

  • Three glass discs stacked in the dark, crossed by a streak of cyan light, with a thin gold spark rising beneath them

    Grok 4.7

    Pick Grok 4.7 for uncensored roleplay and fiction that must work with no jailbreak; skip it for long chapters per turn or long agent loops.

    Spicy Index
    78.2
    Freedom Score
    100.0

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review
  • Warm golden light streaks passing through a row of translucent blue glass panels on a dark pedestal

    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for cheap, whole-document reads and a 384,000-token ceiling; add a system prompt to steady intimate scenes (L4).

    Spicy Index
    81.9
    Freedom Score
    90.4

    Tested Sep 26, 2026

    Read the review
  • Small blank marble tiles race along a short brass rail on a basalt plinth into a three-slot marble gate, where a gold filament splits into three channels ending in three neat stacks

    Claude Haiku 5.5

    Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 for roleplay and companion chats at volume: it wrote 7 of 9 intimate scenes in full and costs a twentieth of Sonnet 5.5.

    Spicy Index
    76.5
    Freedom Score
    77.8

    Tested Oct 8, 2026

    Read the review