Skip to main content

Model comparisons

GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

GLM 5.3 Flash bills 86% less than GLM 5.2 per million output tokens. Tier prices, request fields and limits side by side.

GLM 5.2

GLM 5.2 is Z.ai's long-context chat model behind an OpenAI-compatible call. It reads up to 1,048,576 tokens, replies up to 131,072, and offers two reasoning-effort levels, 128 tool schemas per request and JSON output.

View model details →View sample outputs →

GLM 5.3 Flash

GLM 5.3 Flash is Z.ai's long-context chat model behind an OpenAI-compatible call. It reads up to 1,048,576 tokens, replies up to 131,072, and offers three reasoning-effort levels, 128 tool schemas per request and JSON output.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Compare

The short answer

Start with the input you have, the result you want and your budget. These are the differences that affect that choice.

  • GLM 5.3 Flash costs 86% less per million output tokens. Compare the input and cache rates below for longer conversations.
  • Both are listed as Uncensored. Compare the examples and content-test details on each model page for the scenes you want to create.

Compare the published examples, then try the same input on both models with matching settings.

Test scores side by side

The Spicy Index and Freedom Score for both models, from the same daily calculation as the leaderboards.

Test scores side by side
MeasureGLM 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash
Spicy Index71.972.9
Freedom Score67.864.4
EvidenceTested 5 of 5 probe types · 24 runsTested 5 of 5 probe types · 24 runs
Range if the rest pass67.8–67.864.4–64.4
Price$1.51 per 1M mixed tokens (3 input : 1 output)$0.202 per 1M mixed tokens (3 input : 1 output)
ReviewsRead the GLM 5.2 reviewRead the GLM 5.3 Flash review
See both on the leaderboard →

Current price

Price at the same setting

A start price answers a different question than the one you have. These are the tiers both models publish, matched setting for setting, in US dollars per billed unit with no conversion step in between.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

Price at the same setting
TierGLM 5.2GLM 5.3 FlashDifference
Input$0.98 / 1 million tokens$0.128 / 1 million tokensGLM 5.3 Flash −86%
Cached input$0.182 / 1 million tokens$0.025 / 1 million tokensGLM 5.3 Flash −85%
Output$3.08 / 1 million tokens$0.425 / 1 million tokensGLM 5.3 Flash −86%

What one ordinary job costs

  • GLM 5.2: $1.6 for one million input and two hundred thousand output tokens.
  • GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.213 for one million input and two hundred thousand output tokens.

Arithmetic on the published rates at each model's own default setting, not a quote. The console prices your actual settings before a request is accepted.

About this comparison

Controls and limits

Every row here is read from the JSON Schema the endpoint validates against, so it matches what the API will really accept rather than a feature list written by hand.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

GLM 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Controls and limitsGLM 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash
Supported taskschatchat
Input context1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Maximum output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Tool callingYesYes
ExecutionSynchronous, with streamingSynchronous, with streaming
Request timeout60 minutes60 minutes
AvailabilityLiveLive

Do low-filter models allow every request?

Content policy, side by side

Two separate facts sit behind these labels. The first is what we do, which is nothing: no platform content filter, and no maturity flag to set on a request. The second is what each model does on its own, and that is the only part that varies between these two.

GLM 5.2

Uncensored

We add no content filter to this model, but like most chat models it declines a blunt request that comes with no context. It writes unrestricted fiction reliably once your system prompt sets up a fiction-writing context, or once the request is framed as a story. Legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

Usage note Use only authorized material. Do not invade privacy, impersonate a real person, or create sexual content involving minors.

GLM 5.3 Flash

Uncensored

We add no content filter to this model, but like most chat models it declines a blunt request that comes with no context. It writes unrestricted fiction reliably once your system prompt sets up a fiction-writing context, or once the request is framed as a story. Legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

Use these content labels to shortlist models, then open each model page for available examples and content-test details.

The label never changes your obligations. Age, consent, real-person likeness and the law where you operate stay with you, and SpicyAPI does not inspect each request.

Can I swap the model ID without changing the request body?

Request body, field by field

The task lifecycle is shared; the body is not. Each endpoint publishes its own JSON Schema and the API validates against that, so this is the list to reconcile before a switch.

  • 9 fields appear in both request bodies under the same names. stop, tools, top_p, messages, max_tokens, temperature, tool_choice, response_format, reasoning_effort
  • GLM 5.2 accepts no field the other one lacks.
  • GLM 5.3 Flash accepts no field the other one lacks.
  • GLM 5.2 requires messages.
  • GLM 5.3 Flash requires messages.
  • Both reject unknown fields outright, so a parameter left over from the other model comes back as a validation error instead of being quietly ignored.

Compare

Moving from one to the other

The model identifiers are zai/glm-5.2/chat and zai/glm-5.3-flash/chat, and both go in the same field of the same request.

Both return the response on the chat request. With streaming enabled, read the stream until it finishes; there is no media task to poll.

Both use the same submit-and-track flow, but their required inputs may differ. Check each model page before switching.

One key, one balance, one set of spend caps. Both bill to the same account in US dollars, and the per-key daily, monthly and lifetime limits apply to whichever one you call.

Questions developers ask

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash costs 86% less per million output tokens. Compare the input and cache rates below for longer conversations. Prices may change; check the estimate shown for your actual settings before submitting.

How long can a single request run?

GLM 5.2 allows 60 minutes per task and GLM 5.3 Flash allows 60. Those are ceilings rather than typical times — most requests finish far sooner — but they are what your own client timeout has to survive.

Prices and capabilities shown here come from the current public model catalogue. Check each model page for its latest inputs and examples.

Related comparisons