Skip to main content

GLM 5.2 is Z.ai's long-context chat model behind an OpenAI-compatible call. It reads up to 1,048,576 tokens, replies up to 131,072, and offers two reasoning-effort levels, 128 tool schemas per request and JSON output.

Input $0.98Output $3.08per 1 million tokens30% below the publisher's list priceCached input $0.182Z.ai official priceInput $1.40Output $4.40

Workbench

GLM 5.2

What can GLM 5.2 help with?

Related models and next tasks

Missing the model you need?

Tell us what to add and where you would use it. Requests go to the people who decide what gets onboarded next.

Build stable message flows for long-document analysis, structured technical work, and coding

This endpoint is the catalog's verified GLM 5.2. It is presented as 5.2—not renamed to a newer release—and focuses on document structure, evidence tracing, and reviewable output.

Open the chat playground
Build stable message flows for long-document analysis, structured technical work, and coding
Model
GLM 5.2
Good for
long-document analysis, structured technical work, and coding
Message shape
System rules → evidence and state → current task → output contract
Fact boundary
Capabilities, controls, and price come from the live schema

Integration principle

Validate with the smallest message set, then add necessary context. Separate facts, assumptions, and constraints, and design interruption, retry, settlement, and review paths.

Build repeatable workflows for long-document analysis, structured technical work, and coding

This endpoint is the catalog's verified GLM 5.2. It is presented as 5.2—not renamed to a newer release—and focuses on document structure, evidence tracing, and reviewable output.

  • Document frame

    Put the question before the corpus

    Place the decision, expected artifact, and evaluation standard before large source material.

  • Evidence map

    Make sections addressable

    Label documents and sections so each important conclusion can point to supplied material.

  • Review loop

    Separate facts, assumptions, risks, and gaps

    Structured output prevents plausible narrative from being mistaken for documented truth.

Where GLM 5.2 wins on task cost and interaction shape

Test one real task for quality, verifiability, latency, and sale-price fit instead of relying on a general leaderboard.

  1. Choose GLM

    The source material is the center of the task

    Use it for specification review, document comparison, technical synthesis, and context-grounded coding.

  2. Choose a deliberate peer

    The task is an open strategic decision

    Compare reasoning-oriented models when uncertain external assumptions matter more than corpus navigation.

  3. Keep release honest

    Do not infer an upgrade from naming trends

    A future release needs its own catalog record, tests, pricing, and page.

Turn GLM 5.2 into concrete work, not generic labels

Every scenario needs input boundaries, verification, and recovery; official capabilities, benchmarks, and tool support are never invented.

  • Pre-implementation review

    Specifications

    Pre-implementation review

    Extract requirements, contradictions, ambiguous terms, missing acceptance criteria, and dependencies.

  • Cross-document change analysis

    Comparison

    Cross-document change analysis

    Map clauses or interfaces and classify changes as compatible, breaking, unresolved, or editorial.

  • Implementation grounded in contracts

    Coding

    Implementation grounded in contracts

    Provide interfaces and invariants, then request a plan, code, tests, and requirement traceability.

  • Evidence-preserving synthesis

    Research

    Evidence-preserving synthesis

    Separate documented findings, interpretations, disagreements, and questions the corpus cannot answer.

Organize context into an inspectable GLM 5.2 input

Objective, evidence, state, constraints, and output contract need distinct jobs so requests can be compressed, debugged, and reproduced.

  1. Question

    Define the exact review task

    Say whether to find gaps, compare versions, extract obligations, or propose code.

  2. Corpus

    Delimit and label every source

    Give each document and section a stable name.

  3. Method

    Specify evidence and uncertainty rules

    Distinguish direct support, inference, contradiction, and missing information.

  4. Artifact

    Choose a reviewable output

    Request a matrix, checklist, change map, plan, or risk register.

Prove a repeatable GLM 5.2 case before product integration

Confirm live schema, quote, streaming, and error behavior before reusing the normalized request.

  1. 01 · Baseline

    Validate the smallest request in Playground

    Check message layers, output shape, streaming, and current controls.

  2. 02 · Boundaries

    Exercise failure, cancellation, and retry

    Verify timeouts, interrupted streams, oversized input, regeneration, and duplicate submission.

  3. 03 · Integrate

    Copy the normalized API request

    Use the public model id and messages contract; read model controls from the live schema.

  4. 04 · Operate

    Meter usage and keep evaluating

    Store state, final usage, failure reasons, and quality feedback; quote expensive calls first.

Bring GLM 5.2 into a clear API contract

Playground, API examples, request states, and usage records stay aligned from evaluation through production integration.

  • Unified contract

    One shape for messages, streams, and errors

    Keep request structure, state handling, and error recovery consistent when changing models.

  • Live schema

    Use the current endpoint controls

    Playground and API examples expose available fields, limits, and default behavior together.

  • Observable lifecycle

    Every request has a clear state

    Submission, streaming, failure, cancellation, and usage use inspectable public semantics.

  • Portable integration

    Reduce work when models evolve

    A clear contract keeps product code focused on inputs, results, and user experience.

GLM 5.2 API boundaries to confirm before integration