Skip to main content

Model comparisons

Kling 4.0 vs Seedance 2.5

Kling 4.0: Filtered. Seedance 2.5: Uncensored. Tier prices, request fields and limits side by side.

Kling 4.0

Kling 4.0 image-to-video animates your opening frame into a clip of 3 to 30 seconds at 720p or 1080p. Add a closing frame and up to 8 in-between keyframes to direct the path; every clip comes with a stereo soundtrack.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Seedance 2.5

ByteDance's Seedance 2.5 image-to-video starts the clip on a still you supply and animates it, with sound in the same pass. Clips run 4 to 30 seconds at 480p, 720p or 1080p, and an optional closing still makes the shot arrive on a set frame.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Compare

The short answer

Start with the input you have, the result you want and your budget. These are the differences that affect that choice.

  • Kling 4.0 is listed as Filtered; Seedance 2.5 as Uncensored. Compare the examples and content-test details on each model page for the scenes you want to create.
  • The two bill on different tiers, so there is no like-for-like row: Kling 4.0 starts at $0.216 / output seconds and Seedance 2.5 at $0.123 / output seconds.

Compare the published examples, then try the same input on both models with matching settings.

Test scores side by side

The Spicy Index and Freedom Score for both models, from the same daily calculation as the leaderboards.

Test scores side by side
MeasureKling 4.0Seedance 2.5
Spicy Index86.581.4
Freedom ScoreNot enough evidence yet83.6
EvidenceTested 2 of 6 probe types · 2 runsTested 5 of 6 probe types · 46 runs
Range if the rest pass0.0–60.083.6–98.9
Price$1.08 per 5-second clip$1.39 per 5-second clip
ReviewsNo review yetRead the Seedance 2.5 review

Preliminary · freedom evidence pending

See both on the leaderboard →

Current price

Price at the same setting

A start price answers a different question than the one you have. These are the tiers both models publish, matched setting for setting, in US dollars per billed unit with no conversion step in between.

These two bill on different tiers, so there is no row to line up. Each one's own published tiers are listed here instead.

Kling 4.0: 720p $0.216 / output seconds · 1080p $0.324 / output seconds

Seedance 2.5: no audio · 480p $0.123 / output seconds · with audio · 480p $0.123 / output seconds · no audio · 720p $0.277 / output seconds · with audio · 720p $0.277 / output seconds · no audio · 1080p $0.682 / output seconds · with audio · 1080p $0.682 / output seconds

What one ordinary job costs

  • Kling 4.0: $1.08 for a five-second clip at 720p.
  • Seedance 2.5: $1.39 for a five-second clip at with audio · 720p.

Arithmetic on the published rates at each model's own default setting, not a quote. The console prices your actual settings before a request is accepted.

About this comparison

Controls and limits

Every row here is read from the JSON Schema the endpoint validates against, so it matches what the API will really accept rather than a feature list written by hand.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

Kling 4.0 vs Seedance 2.5
Controls and limitsKling 4.0Seedance 2.5
Supported tasksimage-to-videoimage-to-video
Clip length3–30 seconds4–30 seconds
Resolution tiers720p · 1080p480p · 720p · 1080p
Aspect ratiosauto · 16:9 · 9:16 · 1:1 · 21:9adaptive
Reference materialUp to 8 filesNot offered
Audio outputYesYes
High-resolution tierYesNo
SeedNoYes
ExecutionSubmit, then poll or take the callbackSubmit, then poll or take the callback
Request timeout60 minutes180 minutes
AvailabilityLiveLive

Do low-filter models allow every request?

Content policy, side by side

Two separate facts sit behind these labels. The first is what we do, which is nothing: no platform content filter, and no maturity flag to set on a request. The second is what each model does on its own, and that is the only part that varies between these two.

Kling 4.0

Filtered

This model refuses requests beyond its own limits outright. Measured, not assumed — models we have not measured carry no label at all.

Seedance 2.5

Uncensored

This model declares no content filter. SpicyAPI forwards the request without adding a platform content scan; legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

Usage note Use consenting adults and licensed material only. No minors, no non-consensual intimate imagery, no deceptive impersonation of real people.

Use these content labels to shortlist models, then open each model page for available examples and content-test details.

The label never changes your obligations. Age, consent, real-person likeness and the law where you operate stay with you, and SpicyAPI does not inspect each request.

Can I swap the model ID without changing the request body?

Request body, field by field

The task lifecycle is shared; the body is not. Each endpoint publishes its own JSON Schema and the API validates against that, so this is the list to reconcile before a switch.

  • 6 fields appear in both request bodies under the same names. aspect_ratio, duration_seconds, image_url, last_image_url, prompt, resolution
  • Only Kling 4.0 accepts: keyframe_image_urls.
  • Only Seedance 2.5 accepts: enable_web_search, generate_audio, output_format, return_last_frame, seed, watermark.
  • Kling 4.0 requires image_url.
  • Seedance 2.5 requires image_url.
  • Both reject unknown fields outright, so a parameter left over from the other model comes back as a validation error instead of being quietly ignored.

How to choose

How to choose

High-resolution delivery

Kling 4.0 supports a high-resolution option.

Compare

Moving from one to the other

The model identifiers are kling/4.0/image-to-video and bytedance/seedance-2.5/image-to-video, and both go in the same field of the same request.

Both run the same way: submit the task, then poll it or take the callback. Queueing and retry logic carry over unchanged.

Both use the same submit-and-track flow, but their required inputs may differ. Check each model page before switching.

One key, one balance, one set of spend caps. Both bill to the same account in US dollars, and the per-key daily, monthly and lifetime limits apply to whichever one you call.

Questions developers ask

Which is cheaper, Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.5?

Which is cheaper, Kling 4.0 or Seedance 2.5?

The two bill on different tiers, so there is no like-for-like row: Kling 4.0 starts at $0.216 / output seconds and Seedance 2.5 at $0.123 / output seconds. Prices may change; check the estimate shown for your actual settings before submitting.

How long can a single request run?

Kling 4.0 allows 60 minutes per task and Seedance 2.5 allows 180. Those are ceilings rather than typical times — most requests finish far sooner — but they are what your own client timeout has to survive.

Prices and capabilities shown here come from the current public model catalogue. Check each model page for its latest inputs and examples.

Related comparisons