Skip to main content

Model comparisons

Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Seedance 2.5

At with audio · 720p, Seedance 2.0 Fast costs 65% less than Seedance 2.5. Seedance 2.5 renders up to 30 seconds per request; Seedance 2.0 Fast stops at 15.

Seedance 2.0 Fast

Seedance 2.0 Fast image-to-video from ByteDance starts the clip on a still you supply and animates it, with sound in the same pass. Clips run 4 to 15 seconds at 480p or 720p, and an optional closing still makes the shot arrive on a set frame.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Seedance 2.5

ByteDance's Seedance 2.5 image-to-video starts the clip on a still you supply and animates it, with sound in the same pass. Clips run 4 to 30 seconds at 480p, 720p or 1080p, and an optional closing still makes the shot arrive on a set frame.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Compare

The short answer

Start with the input you have, the result you want and your budget. These are the differences that affect that choice.

  • Seedance 2.0 Fast is 65% cheaper at with audio · 720p, the closest like-for-like setting the two publish.
  • Seedance 2.5 runs to 30 seconds in one request; Seedance 2.0 Fast stops at 15, so anything longer has to be stitched together.
  • Both are listed as Uncensored. Compare the examples and content-test details on each model page for the scenes you want to create.

Compare the published examples, then try the same input on both models with matching settings.

Test scores side by side

The Spicy Index and Freedom Score for both models, from the same daily calculation as the leaderboards.

Test scores side by side
MeasureSeedance 2.0 FastSeedance 2.5
Spicy Index73.581.4
Freedom Score72.283.6
EvidenceTested 4 of 6 probe types · 44 runsTested 5 of 6 probe types · 46 runs
Range if the rest pass72.2–92.283.6–98.9
Price$0.484 per 5-second clip$1.39 per 5-second clip
ReviewsRead the Seedance 2.0 Fast reviewRead the Seedance 2.5 review
See both on the leaderboard →

Current price

Price at the same setting

A start price answers a different question than the one you have. These are the tiers both models publish, matched setting for setting, in US dollars per billed unit with no conversion step in between.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

Price at the same setting
TierSeedance 2.0 FastSeedance 2.5Difference
no audio · 480p$0.045 / output seconds$0.123 / output secondsSeedance 2.0 Fast −63%
with audio · 480p$0.045 / output seconds$0.123 / output secondsSeedance 2.0 Fast −63%
no audio · 720p$0.097 / output seconds$0.277 / output secondsSeedance 2.0 Fast −65%
with audio · 720p$0.097 / output seconds$0.277 / output secondsSeedance 2.0 Fast −65%

What one ordinary job costs

  • Seedance 2.0 Fast: $0.484 for a five-second clip at with audio · 720p.
  • Seedance 2.5: $1.39 for a five-second clip at with audio · 720p.

Arithmetic on the published rates at each model's own default setting, not a quote. The console prices your actual settings before a request is accepted.

About this comparison

Controls and limits

Every row here is read from the JSON Schema the endpoint validates against, so it matches what the API will really accept rather than a feature list written by hand.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Seedance 2.5
Controls and limitsSeedance 2.0 FastSeedance 2.5
Supported tasksimage-to-videoimage-to-video
Clip length4–15 seconds4–30 seconds
Resolution tiers480p · 720p480p · 720p · 1080p
Aspect ratios16:9 · 9:16 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 1:1 · 21:9 · adaptiveadaptive
Audio outputYesYes
SeedYesYes
ExecutionSubmit, then poll or take the callbackSubmit, then poll or take the callback
Request timeout120 minutes180 minutes
AvailabilityLiveLive

Do low-filter models allow every request?

Content policy, side by side

Two separate facts sit behind these labels. The first is what we do, which is nothing: no platform content filter, and no maturity flag to set on a request. The second is what each model does on its own, and that is the only part that varies between these two.

Seedance 2.0 Fast

Uncensored

This model declares no content filter. SpicyAPI forwards the request without adding a platform content scan; legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

Usage note Use only material you are authorised to process. Check consent, privacy, likeness, brand, and music rights; do not use output to deceive or impersonate.

Seedance 2.5

Uncensored

This model declares no content filter. SpicyAPI forwards the request without adding a platform content scan; legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

Usage note Use consenting adults and licensed material only. No minors, no non-consensual intimate imagery, no deceptive impersonation of real people.

Use these content labels to shortlist models, then open each model page for available examples and content-test details.

The label never changes your obligations. Age, consent, real-person likeness and the law where you operate stay with you, and SpicyAPI does not inspect each request.

Can I swap the model ID without changing the request body?

Request body, field by field

The task lifecycle is shared; the body is not. Each endpoint publishes its own JSON Schema and the API validates against that, so this is the list to reconcile before a switch.

  • 10 fields appear in both request bodies under the same names. aspect_ratio, duration_seconds, generate_audio, image_url, last_image_url, prompt, resolution, return_last_frame, seed, watermark
  • Only Seedance 2.0 Fast accepts: bitrate_mode.
  • Only Seedance 2.5 accepts: enable_web_search, output_format.
  • Seedance 2.0 Fast requires image_url.
  • Seedance 2.5 requires image_url.
  • Both reject unknown fields outright, so a parameter left over from the other model comes back as a validation error instead of being quietly ignored.

Compare

Moving from one to the other

The model identifiers are bytedance/seedance-2.0-fast/image-to-video and bytedance/seedance-2.5/image-to-video, and both go in the same field of the same request.

Both run the same way: submit the task, then poll it or take the callback. Queueing and retry logic carry over unchanged.

Both use the same submit-and-track flow, but their required inputs may differ. Check each model page before switching.

One key, one balance, one set of spend caps. Both bill to the same account in US dollars, and the per-key daily, monthly and lifetime limits apply to whichever one you call.

Questions developers ask

Which is cheaper, Seedance 2.0 Fast or Seedance 2.5?

Which is cheaper, Seedance 2.0 Fast or Seedance 2.5?

Seedance 2.0 Fast is 65% cheaper at with audio · 720p, the closest like-for-like setting the two publish. Prices may change; check the estimate shown for your actual settings before submitting.

How long can a single request run?

Seedance 2.0 Fast allows 120 minutes per task and Seedance 2.5 allows 180. Those are ceilings rather than typical times — most requests finish far sooner — but they are what your own client timeout has to survive.

Prices and capabilities shown here come from the current public model catalogue. Check each model page for its latest inputs and examples.

Related comparisons