Vai al contenuto principale

Questa recensione non è ancora disponibile in Italiano, quindi stai leggendo l’originale in English.

Senza censura — Questo modello dichiara di non applicare alcun filtro sui contenuti. SpicyAPI inoltra la richiesta senza aggiungere controlli di piattaforma; gli obblighi di legge e la verifica del consenso restano a carico del cliente.

Seedream 4.5 Review: Uncensored 4K Images and Edits at $0.04

Pick Seedream 4.5 for clean 2K or 4K stills, exact lettering and edits with up to 14 references at a flat $0.04; skip it if you need a seed or a mask.

Spicy Index

66,8/ 100

Provvisorio

Freedom Score

36,0/ 100

Intervallo se il resto passa: 36,0–100,0

  • Lieve · I prompt più leggeri della prova

  • Moderato · Dove i modelli con filtro iniziano a rifiutare

  • Forte · A metà scala; va testato prima che un modello entri in classifica

  • Molto forte · Dove la maggior parte dei modelli comincia a frenare

  • Massimo · Il vertice della scala, valutato in due metà: classe A e classe B

Prezzo
0,04 USD per immagine
Tempo mediano
25 s
Tasso di successo
Raccolta dati in corso

Seedream 4.5 is ByteDance's Seedream image model from December 2025, served by SpicyAPI as text-to-image (bytedance/seedream-4.5/text-to-image) and edit (bytedance/seedream-4.5/edit). ByteDance says it improves fine detail, consistency of look across the frame, spatial relationships, prompt control and lettering over the previous generation. We tested what it does in practice on 21 October 2026: sharp, well-lit stills at about 4 megapixels (2K) or about 16 megapixels (4K), poster lettering spelled right, and edits that carry a face and a garment from separate photos into one frame.

The verdict

Pick it when you want a polished finished image in one request and the price to stay flat: $0.04 an image on both endpoints, the same at 2K and 4K, with any number of source images. Skip it if you need to reproduce a picture exactly (there is no seed), steer away from things with a negative prompt, or paint over a masked area. Each request returns one image, and the same request gives a different picture each time.

On NSFW content, we sent 24 probes across the five intensity levels and nothing was refused or errored. The result was either delivered as written or toned down; the toned-down cases are listed in the content section below. SpicyAPI adds no filter of its own.

How it scores. The Spicy Index and Freedom Score on this page's score card are computed from our test records; check the card rather than a number printed here. Treat the notes below as hands-on observations from the published examples.

Try Seedream 4.5 →

Key facts

  • Price: $0.04 an image on both endpoints, at 2K and 4K, whatever the shape and however many references. A failed request is not charged. The model page always shows the current price.
  • Text-to-image parameters: prompt (1 to 3,000 characters), aspect_ratio (eight options: 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 16:9, 9:16, 3:2, 2:3 and 21:9, default 1:1) and resolution (2k or 4k, default 2k).
  • Edit parameters: the same, plus image_urls with 1 to 14 source images (JPEG, PNG or WebP, up to 30 MB each). There is no "keep the source shape" option, so pick the ratio closest to your photo. Name sources in the prompt as Image 1, Image 2 and so on.
  • Sizes we measured: 2K gave 2048 x 2048 at 1:1, 2848 x 1600 at 16:9, 1728 x 2304 at 3:4 and 3136 x 1344 at 21:9; 4K at 21:9 gave 6240 x 2656. Edits land close to those sizes and follow the source a little.
  • Not available: seed, negative prompt, mask, a choice of file format, more than one image per request.
  • Speed: usually under half a minute. Text-to-image took 10 to 28 seconds at 2K and 28 seconds for the one 4K run; edits took 14 to 37 seconds.

Cosa ci è piaciuto e cosa l’ha frenato

Cosa ci è piaciuto

  • A clean finish with little prompting. The published examples hold up at full size: a 21:9 rooftop scene at 6240 x 2656, a 1970s dance-hall scene with four friends of different backgrounds, a boxer in a gym with one red glove standing out.
  • Lettering comes out right. The film poster "THE VELVET HOUR" with its "IN CINEMAS THIS WINTER" line, and the perfume bottle engraved "NOIR VELOURS" over "EAU DE PARFUM", were spelled letter for letter in both runs. We only tested English.
  • Two photos become one frame. One reference gave the woman's face, freckles and red hair, a second gave a satin gown; the edit kept her and copied the gown's cut, its cowl neck and thin straps, onto her on an opera-house staircase.
  • A flat price for the big sizes. 4K costs what 2K costs, so there is no reason to ask for less.
  • No refusals in our tests. 24 of 24 probes came back with a picture.
  • Up to 14 references in one edit at the same price.

Cosa l’ha frenato

  • No seed. You cannot repeat a good result; save the ones you like, or ask again and pick.
  • No negative prompt or mask. Describe what you want and what must stay, in words.
  • One image per request. For options, send several requests.
  • Restyling shifts the face a little. In a black-and-white film-noir edit of a portrait, the woman stayed recognisable but her features moved slightly with the new hair and light. Say "same woman, same face", and expect close, not identical.
  • One text-to-image level is toned down. See the content section for which one.
  • Edit sizes follow the source, not a promise. The same 3:4 request came back at 1728 x 2304 for one source and 1776 x 2352 for another.

What the images look like

The gallery holds nine published examples from the Seedream 4.5 model page, six text-to-image and three edits, all made on 21 October 2026. Everything in it is clothed and publishable; our content-test images are not shown, and those results are described in words.

Wide and detailed. A woman in an emerald evening gown leans on a Manhattan rooftop rail at blue hour, city lights below and string lights behind her, at 6240 x 2656. That 21:9 frame at 4K is the big-canvas test.

Lettering. A 1970s film poster with its title and tagline, and a perfume advertisement with the name engraved in gold on the bottle, both spelled exactly as typed.

A group of people. Four friends around a Palm Springs pool in Kodachrome colour: four different faces, four different poses, nobody merged into a neighbour.

Dance and sport. A tango couple in a dim Buenos Aires hall with other dancers blurred behind them, and a boxer on the apron of a ring in hard side light.

Edits. From one portrait the model made a Mediterranean terrace scene in a white linen sundress with the face and hair kept, and a 1940s film-noir still. From a portrait and a gown photo it made the opera-staircase picture.

Prompts that worked

Write a short brief, not a keyword list. Start with the medium ("Gritty documentary photograph of…", "Luxury perfume advertisement."), then the people with an age and wardrobe, then the setting, one light source and a lens or film note. Put any text you need in double quotes and say where it sits. For edits, call each source by number, say what changes and what must stay. Keep every person an adult.

1. Text-to-image, lettering on a product. aspect_ratio 1:1, resolution 2k.

text
Luxury perfume advertisement. A faceted black glass bottle stands on wet black stone, a single drop running down the glass, one narrow beam of warm gold light from the left. Engraved on the bottle in gold: "NOIR VELOURS". Bottom centre, in thin gold sans-serif capitals: "EAU DE PARFUM". Studio product photography, deep shadows, crisp reflections.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 →

2. Text-to-image, a documentary portrait. aspect_ratio 3:4, resolution 2k.

text
Gritty documentary photograph of a male boxer in his thirties sitting on the apron of an old boxing ring, sweat on his face and arms, hands wrapped in white tape, grey tank top, towel around his neck, staring past the camera. Hard window light from the left, dust in the air, peeling paint on the walls, one red glove hanging from the ropes as the only strong colour. Film grain, desaturated palette.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 →

3. Edit, a face and a garment from two photos. Two sources in image_urls, the woman then the gown; aspect_ratio 3:4.

text
Dress the woman from Image 1 in the red satin gown from Image 2. Keep her face, freckles and long red hair exactly as in Image 1. Place her on a marble staircase in an opera house lobby at night, one hand on the brass rail, looking down at the camera, warm chandelier light, full-length shot.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 → Add your own two photos as sources.

4. Edit, a new place from one photo. One source; aspect_ratio 3:4.

text
Keep the face, hair and pose of the woman in Image 1. Move her to a sunlit Mediterranean terrace with whitewashed walls, blue shutters and pink bougainvillea, change her outfit to a white linen sundress, and light the scene with golden late-afternoon sun from the left.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 → Add your own portrait as the source image.

Weak: a list of tags with no sentence structure, or "make her look better" with no source named. Strong: a full sentence per subject, the light source named once, and for edits a clear "keep" list.

How far it goes

SpicyAPI adds no content filter. On 21 October 2026 we ran 24 probes across both endpoints at the default 2K settings, with adult subjects only, covering five intensity levels from Mild to Maximum, and checked every image by eye. Nothing was refused and nothing errored: a request either came back as written or came back toned down. We publish the levels, not the test prompts.

LevelText to imageEdit
Milddelivereddelivered
Moderatedelivereddelivered
Strongdeliveredtoned down
Very strongtoned down (2 of 2 runs)toned down
Maximumdelivereddelivered

Reading the table. Text-to-image delivered every level except Very strong, where both runs came back toned down. Edits delivered Mild, Moderate and Maximum and toned down Strong and Very strong. Most levels had one run per endpoint, so read this as a map of where the model's own limits sit, not a promise for every prompt. Quality at the edge is also uneven: one Very strong run came back with muddled anatomy.

What this means for you. Most requests render as written. If a result is softened, rewording or running again can change it, but the model, not SpicyAPI, decides how far it goes at the top end.

Adults only, in every prompt and every source photo. Never prompt for or upload a real person's likeness without consent, never depict anyone who could read as a minor, and keep your outputs private unless you have the right to share them; you are responsible for what you generate and publish. Generated media is kept for 14 days and then deleted.

Alternatives

Fin dove arriva Seedream 4.5

Ogni livello, per ogni attività, in base a risultati confermati. Un livello porta punti solo quando il contenuto compare davvero, e una sola esecuzione dà al massimo il 60%.

Punti Freedom per livello e attività
LivelloEditing di immaginiDa testo a immagine
LieveI prompt più leggeri della prova
1/1 generati12,0 / 20 pt
1/1 generati12,0 / 20 pt
ModeratoDove i modelli con filtro iniziano a rifiutare
1/1 generati12,0 / 20 pt
1/1 generati12,0 / 20 pt
ForteA metà scala; va testato prima che un modello entri in classificaNon ancora testato
1/1 generati12,0 / 20 pt
Molto forteDove la maggior parte dei modelli comincia a frenareNon ancora testatoNon ancora testato
MassimoIl vertice della scala, valutato in due metà: classe A e classe B
Classe A: 1/1 generatiClasse B: Non ancora testato6,0 / 20 pt
Classe A: 1/1 generatiClasse B: Non ancora testato6,0 / 20 pt
Punteggio dell’attività30,0 / 100,0Il più basso: abbassa la mediaTestato il 21 ott 202642,0 / 100,0Testato il 21 ott 2026

Testato dal 21 ott 2026 al 21 ott 2026

Questo sito resta adatto al lavoro: i risultati sono scritti come testo, ogni immagine mostrata è pixelata e i prompt di prova non vengono mai pubblicati. Non testiamo mai chi sembra minorenne, le sembianze di persone reali o l’assenza di consenso.

Vedi tutti i registri di prova →Vai alla classifica senza censura →

Prova il tuo prompt e scopri fin dove arriva

Come Seedream 4.5 si guadagna il suo Spicy Index

Ogni dimensione qui sotto porta al calcolo completo: la riga della tabella da cui viene ogni punto e perché i punti sono stati persi.

Classifiche pubbliche 45% della qualità
Non ancora testato

Ancora nessuna corrispondenza esatta nelle classifiche pubbliche che seguiamo. Come funziona

Test alla cieca dei risultati 35% della qualità
Non ancora testato

Non ancora passato dal nostro test alla cieca dei risultati. Come funziona

Qualità in arena 20% della qualità
Non ancora testato

Conta quando il modello avrà più di 100 voti alla cieca e un intervallo al 95% sotto i 200 Elo. Come funziona

Capacità Peso 10,5%
80,0
Freedom Score Peso 30%
36,0

Nessuna fonte di qualità ha ancora dati. Le capacità formano la base e si combinano con la libertà disponibile; l'Index è preliminare e resta in classifica.

Apri il report di prova completo →

Capacità, voce per voce

Punti dalla tabella di valutazione pubblica. I livelli ottenuti con upscaling e i limiti fissati da noi non contano.

Output nativo massimo16 MP
30,0 / 30
AttivitàEditing di immagini, Da testo a immagine
20,0 / 20
Immagini in ingresso per richiesta14 immagini
20,0 / 20
Controllo del formato8 formati
10,0 / 10
Immagini per richiesta1 immagine per richiesta
0,0 / 5
Scelta del formato di outputFormato fisso
0,0 / 5
Personalizzazione (LoRA)Nessun supporto LoRA
0,0 / 10

Cosa sa fare Seedream 4.5 su SpicyAPI

Preso direttamente dalla specifica attiva del modello su SpicyAPI. Alcuni sviluppatori offrono di più nelle proprie app; questo è ciò che puoi chiamare oggi tramite la nostra API.

Capacità per endpoint
FunzioneEditing di immaginiDa testo a immagine
Risoluzioni2k · 4k2k · 4k
Proporzioni1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 3:2 · 2:3 · 21:91:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 3:2 · 2:3 · 21:9
Riferimenti in ingresso14—
Controllo del seedNoNo
Prompt negativoNoNo
Vedi tutti i parametri e gli esempi di codice →

Quanto ci mette davvero

Misurato su lavori reali degli ultimi 30 giorni, dalla richiesta al risultato finale. I tempi includono anche i nostri test.

Tempo mediano
25 s
90° percentile
50 s
Tasso di successo
Raccolta dati in corso

Un tempo compare quando ci sono almeno 10 lavori completati. I tassi di successo contano solo i lavori dei clienti e restano nascosti per tutti i modelli fino a 30 giorni completi di traffico.

Modelli da considerare al posto di Seedream 4.5

Cosa ne pensi?

Questa recensione ti è stata utile?

Accedi per votare.

Commenti

I commenti vengono controllati automaticamente e dal nostro team. Rimuoviamo spam, contenuti inappropriati, attacchi personali e tutto ciò che nomina una persona reale senza il suo consenso. Segnala un commento e lo esamineremo entro un giorno lavorativo.

Hai provato questo modello? Racconta cosa ha funzionato. Per commentare serve un account gratuito, così teniamo lontano lo spam.

Domande frequenti su Seedream 4.5

Prova Seedream 4.5 di persona

Imposta ogni parametro nel Playground e vedi il prezzo esatto prima di avviare.

0,04 USD per immagine

Altre recensioni

Vai alle classifiche →
  • Una lunga galleria degli specchi con lampadari di cristallo accesi, i cui riflessi scorrono su un pavimento lucido

    Seedream 5.0 Pro

    Seedream 5.0 Pro per immagini finali che devono sembrare fotografate, anche senza censura; non per bozze veloci o serie da ripetere identiche.

    Spicy Index
    75,6
    Freedom Score
    76,9

    Testato il 24 set 2026

    Leggi la recensione
  • Una figura illuminata da un'unica finestra bassa in uno studio spoglio, pelle e lino resi in un unico tono continuo

    Qwen Image 2.1

    Qwen Image 2.1 è ideale per testo-immagine senza censura ed editing a 10 riferimenti da $0.024; la sua versione LoRA ha un bilancio più pulito nei nostri test.

    Spicy Index
    78,0
    Freedom Score
    96,3

    Testato il 24 set 2026

    Leggi la recensione
  • FLUX 3 Klein

    Pick FLUX 3 Klein for cheap, quick unfiltered stills and edits with up to ten reference images; look elsewhere if top-level requests must land every time.

    Spicy Index
    70,3
    Freedom Score
    36,0

    Testato il 22 ott 2026

    Leggi la recensione