Skip to main content

Model comparisons

Kling 2.6 vs Kling 3.0

At 720p, Kling 2.6 costs 31% less than Kling 3.0. Tier prices, request fields and limits side by side.

Kling 2.6

Kling 2.6 Motion Control copies a driving clip's moves, expressions and gestures onto your own character photo. Choose 720p or 1080p; the result matches the driving clip's length (3 to 30 seconds) and has no audio.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Kling 3.0

Kling 3.0 Motion Control copies the moves, expressions and gestures of a 3 to 30 second driving clip onto one character photo, at 720p or 1080p. The result runs exactly as long as the driving video.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Compare

The short answer

Start with the input you have, the result you want and your budget. These are the differences that affect that choice.

  • Kling 2.6 is 31% cheaper at 720p, the closest like-for-like setting the two publish.
  • Both are listed as Filtered. Compare the examples and content-test details on each model page for the scenes you want to create.

Compare the published examples, then try the same input on both models with matching settings.

Test scores side by side

The Spicy Index and Freedom Score for both models, from the same daily calculation as the leaderboards.

Test scores side by side
MeasureKling 2.6Kling 3.0
Spicy Index37.545.9
Freedom Score12.016.0
EvidenceTested 4 of 6 probe types · 13 runsTested 5 of 6 probe types · 15 runs
Range if the rest pass12.0–66.716.0–50.0
Price$0.345 per 5-second clip$0.336 per 5-second clip
ReviewsRead the Kling 2.6 reviewRead the Kling 3.0 review
See both on the leaderboard →

Current price

Price at the same setting

A start price answers a different question than the one you have. These are the tiers both models publish, matched setting for setting, in US dollars per billed unit with no conversion step in between.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

Price at the same setting
TierKling 2.6Kling 3.0Difference
720p$0.069 / output seconds$0.101 / output secondsKling 2.6 −31%
1080p$0.112 / output seconds$0.134 / output secondsKling 2.6 −16%

About this comparison

Controls and limits

Every row here is read from the JSON Schema the endpoint validates against, so it matches what the API will really accept rather than a feature list written by hand.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

Kling 2.6 vs Kling 3.0
Controls and limitsKling 2.6Kling 3.0
Supported taskscharacter-animationcharacter-animation
Resolution tiers720p · 1080p720p · 1080p
Audio outputYesYes
High-resolution tierYesYes
Negative promptNoYes
ExecutionSubmit, then poll or take the callbackSubmit, then poll or take the callback
Request timeout60 minutes60 minutes
AvailabilityLiveLive

Do low-filter models allow every request?

Content policy, side by side

Two separate facts sit behind these labels. The first is what we do, which is nothing: no platform content filter, and no maturity flag to set on a request. The second is what each model does on its own, and that is the only part that varies between these two.

Kling 2.6

Filtered

This model refuses requests beyond its own limits outright. Measured, not assumed — models we have not measured carry no label at all.

Kling 3.0

Filtered

This model refuses requests beyond its own limits outright. Measured, not assumed — models we have not measured carry no label at all.

Use these content labels to shortlist models, then open each model page for available examples and content-test details.

The label never changes your obligations. Age, consent, real-person likeness and the law where you operate stay with you, and SpicyAPI does not inspect each request.

Can I swap the model ID without changing the request body?

Request body, field by field

The task lifecycle is shared; the body is not. Each endpoint publishes its own JSON Schema and the API validates against that, so this is the list to reconcile before a switch.

  • 4 fields appear in both request bodies under the same names. image_url, prompt, resolution, video_url
  • Kling 2.6 accepts no field the other one lacks.
  • Only Kling 3.0 accepts: character_orientation, keep_original_audio, negative_prompt, shot_type.
  • Kling 2.6 requires image_url, video_url.
  • Kling 3.0 requires image_url, video_url.
  • Both reject unknown fields outright, so a parameter left over from the other model comes back as a validation error instead of being quietly ignored.

Compare

Moving from one to the other

The model identifiers are kling/2.6/character-animation and kling/3.0/character-animation, and both go in the same field of the same request.

Both run the same way: submit the task, then poll it or take the callback. Queueing and retry logic carry over unchanged.

Both use the same submit-and-track flow, but their required inputs may differ. Check each model page before switching.

One key, one balance, one set of spend caps. Both bill to the same account in US dollars, and the per-key daily, monthly and lifetime limits apply to whichever one you call.

Questions developers ask

Which is cheaper, Kling 2.6 or Kling 3.0?

Which is cheaper, Kling 2.6 or Kling 3.0?

Kling 2.6 is 31% cheaper at 720p, the closest like-for-like setting the two publish. Prices may change; check the estimate shown for your actual settings before submitting.

How long can a single request run?

Kling 2.6 allows 60 minutes per task and Kling 3.0 allows 60. Those are ceilings rather than typical times — most requests finish far sooner — but they are what your own client timeout has to survive.

Prices and capabilities shown here come from the current public model catalogue. Check each model page for its latest inputs and examples.

Related comparisons