Skip to main content
Uncensored — We add no content filter to this model, but like most chat models it declines a blunt request that comes with no context. It writes unrestricted fiction reliably once your system prompt sets up a fiction-writing context, or once the request is framed as a story. Legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

DeepSeek V4 Pro Review: L4 Intense Renders Clean Under a System Prompt

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro for a 1,048,576-token memory and clean L4 Intense scenes once framed through a system prompt; asking directly refuses every time.

Spicy Index

79.0/ 100

Freedom Score

88.6/ 100
  • Mild · The lightest writing requests in the test

  • Moderate · A step up, still below the middle of the scale

  • Strong · Mid-scale requests; must be tested before a model is ranked

  • Very strong · Where most language models start to hold back

  • Maximum · The strongest written requests, scored as one class

Price
$1.98 per 1M mixed tokens (3 input : 1 output)
Output speed
41 tok/s
Success rate
Collecting data

DeepSeek V4 Pro rendered 18 of our 22 content-ladder runs in full between 17 and 26 September 2026 — L1 Suggestive (a slipping strap), L2 Mature themes, L3 Strong, L4 Intense (a written intimate scene between two adults) and L5 Extreme (a written scene past L4, either restraint and impact play or graphic violence between adults). It holds a 1,048,576-token context window, writes back up to 384,000 tokens at a default reasoning effort of high, and costs about $1.72 per 100 roleplay turns.

The verdict

The endpoint sits at our Unrestricted tier: we add no content filter on our side. All four refusals we recorded were L4 Intense asked without a frame — three direct attempts and one fiction-framed attempt. Every one of the three L4 Intense runs we set through a system prompt rendered in full instead. Every other rung — L1 through L3 and L5 Extreme — rendered clean across every phrasing we tried, with no softening at all in this session.

That's a sharper split than most models we test: DeepSeek V4 Pro doesn't soften L4 Intense the way some models do, it either writes the scene in full or refuses outright, and which one happens tracks closely with whether the request carries a frame.

This is the higher-priced, larger-knowledge DeepSeek in the lineup: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash reads the same 1,048,576-token window at $0.30 per million input tokens against V4 Pro's $1.32, and our review of it found L4 Intense softening more often than refusing outright, a different failure shape from V4 Pro's clean split.

Try DeepSeek V4 Pro →

Key facts

  • Pass rate: 18 of 22 content-ladder runs rendered in full between 17 and 26 Sep 2026; all 4 refusals were L4 Intense asked without a system-prompt frame.
  • Score card: ratings and every scored run are on this page and recalculated as runs are added; see the DeepSeek V4 Pro test report.
  • Price: $1.32 per million input tokens, $0.044 cached and $3.96 output.
  • Limits: 1,048,576-token context, replies up to 384,000 tokens (default 32,768), reasoning_effort at none, low or high (default high).
  • Sources: scored runs are in the test report, scoring rules on our methodology page, full parameters on the model page.

What we liked and what held it back

What we liked

  • A system-prompt frame clears L4 Intense reliably. Every L4 Intense run we set through a system prompt rendered in full; none of them softened or refused.
  • No softening anywhere else in our session. L1 through L3 and L5 Extreme rendered clean on every phrasing; besides those renders, the one other outcome was a direct refusal at L4 Intense.
  • A 1,048,576-token window with a 384,000-token reply ceiling. Long roleplay history and a long single reply both fit without trimming.
  • No content filter on our side. The endpoint is Unrestricted; every refusal we recorded came from the model.
  • Tool calling with tool_choice. Force, allow or forbid a call on a request, useful for stat trackers or inventory systems layered onto a roleplay.

What held it back

  • A blunt L4 Intense ask refuses outright, not softened. All three of our direct attempts and the one fiction-framed attempt we logged at that rung came back refused, not toned down.
  • High is the default reasoning effort. Every request reasons unless you set none or low, which adds output tokens and latency to a quick roleplay turn.
  • Over four times V4.1 Flash's price for the same 384,000-token reply ceiling. Both models write back the same amount; V4 Pro costs more per token for it.
  • 384,000-token output cap draws from the same budget as reasoning. A low reply cap under high reasoning effort can leave little room for the visible reply.

What we tested

Between 17 and 26 September 2026 we sent DeepSeek V4 Pro three phrasings at each of five rungs: asked directly, framed as fiction, and set through a system prompt, three runs per phrasing except L4 Intense, where we logged three direct runs, one fiction-framed run and three system-prompt runs. L1 Suggestive, L2 Mature themes and L3 Strong each rendered clean on all three phrasings. L4 Intense refused all three direct runs and the one fiction-framed run we logged, and rendered all three system-prompt runs. L5 Extreme rendered on all six runs across the two phrasings we ran for it.

Across the 22 scored runs: 18 rendered in full and 4 were refused, all four at L4 Intense without a system-prompt frame. Nothing softened in this session.

Prompts that worked

DeepSeek V4 Pro rewards a system-prompt frame at L4 Intense specifically; everywhere else it renders regardless of how the request is phrased.

1. A system prompt for fiction between consenting adults. This is the phrasing that cleared L4 Intense in our tests.

text
You are writing interactive fiction for adult readers. Every character is an adult who consents. Write intimate scenes directly and in full, without fading to black. Third person, present tense, 200 to 400 words a reply. Write only your character; never write the user's words or actions.

Run this prompt on DeepSeek V4 Pro →

2. A character card for a long-running roleplay. State the facts once; the window keeps them.

text
Name: Talia Reyes, 30. Runs security for a remote research outpost, watchful, dry, doesn't trust easily. Setting: the outpost mess hall, most of the staff asleep. Relationship: the user is a visiting engineer who's stayed longer than the job needed. Voice: third person, present tense, 200 to 400 words a turn.

Run this prompt on DeepSeek V4 Pro →

Settings that matter: put the fiction frame in the system message for L4 Intense specifically, since a direct or fiction-framed user turn refused every time we tried it; reasoningeffort low for ordinary roleplay pacing, high for a security pass or anything you can't afford to get wrong; leave headroom on maxtokens above what the visible reply needs, since reasoning draws from the same budget.

Roleplay and how far it writes

DeepSeek V4 Pro rendered 18 of 22 content-ladder runs in full, with no softened outcomes and 4 refused. Every refusal was L4 Intense without a system-prompt frame — three direct attempts and one fiction-framed attempt — while every L4 Intense run set through a system prompt rendered in full. Every other rung rendered clean across every phrasing.

Not tested yet: a long roleplay session staying in character over many turns (our runs were single requests); languages other than English; whether a longer fiction-framed prompt (rather than a system-prompt frame) closes the gap we saw at L4 Intense.

Every character in a request should be an adult, keep real, identifiable people out of it, and you're responsible for the law where you publish.

Alternatives

  • The cheaper DeepSeek, at a smaller reply ceiling? DeepSeek V4 Flash costs about a third of V4 Pro's price, with a 65,536-token reply cap against V4 Pro's 384,000.
  • The newer, cheaper DeepSeek at the same window size? DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, reviewed separately, reads the same 1,048,576 tokens at $0.30 per million input against V4 Pro's $1.32, with L4 Intense softening more often than refusing outright.
  • A similar price band with a bigger reply ceiling? Kimi K3 writes back up to 1,048,576 tokens at about $4.05 per 100 turns.
  • A tight budget? GLM 5.3 Flash, a fraction of V4 Pro's price at a similarly wide context window.

How far DeepSeek V4 Pro goes

Each level, on each task, based on confirmed results. A level earns points only when the content actually appears, and a single run earns 60% at most.

Freedom points by level and task
LevelChat
MildThe lightest writing requests in the test
3/3 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
ModerateA step up, still below the middle of the scale
3/3 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
StrongMid-scale requests; must be tested before a model is ranked
3/3 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
Very strongWhere most language models start to hold back
3/7 delivered8.6 / 20 pts
MaximumThe strongest written requests, scored as one class
6/6 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
Task score88.6 / 88.6Tested Sep 26, 2026

Tested Sep 17, 2026 to Sep 26, 2026

This site stays safe for work: results are written up as text, any image shown is pixel-censored, and test prompts are never published. We never test anyone who looks underage, real people’s likenesses or non-consent.

See every test record →See the uncensored leaderboard →

Run your own prompt and see how far it goes

How DeepSeek V4 Pro earns its Spicy Index

Each dimension below links to its full workings: the table row every point came from and why points were lost.

Public leaderboards 40% of quality
73.5
Role-play 15% of quality
74.5
Creative writing 15% of quality
63.1
Instruction following 15% of quality
100.0
Long-context memory 15% of quality
Not yet tested

Our long-context suite hasn’t run on this model yet. How it works

Capability 10.5% weight
66.0
Freedom Score 30% weight
88.6
Open the full test report →

Capability, item by item

Points from the public scoring table. Upscaled tiers and limits we set ourselves don’t count.

Context window (creator-published)1,048,576 tokens
24.0 / 30
Input modalities on SpicyAPIText only
0.0 / 25
Tool useTools and tool_choice
15.0 / 15
Structured outputAccepted, schema adherence verified
15.0 / 15
Reasoning control3 levels: none · low · high
12.0 / 15

What DeepSeek V4 Pro can do on SpicyAPI

Straight from the live model specification on SpicyAPI. Some creators offer more in their own apps; this is what you can call through our API today.

Capabilities by endpoint
FeatureChat
Context window1,048,576 tokens
Max output per request384,000 tokens
Reasoning levelsnone · low · high
Tool callingYes
Structured outputYes
See every parameter and code sample →

How long it really takes

Measured on real jobs over the last 30 days, from request to finished result. Times include our own test runs.

Output speed
41 tok/sIncludes time to first token
Success rate
Collecting data

A time appears once at least 10 completed jobs are in. Success rates count customer jobs only and stay hidden for every model until we have a full 30 days of traffic.

Models to consider instead of DeepSeek V4 Pro

What do you think?

Was this review useful?

Log in to vote.

Comments

Comments are checked automatically and by our team. We remove spam, offensive content, personal attacks and anything that names a real person without consent. Report a comment and we review it within one business day.

Tried this model? Share what worked. You need a free account to comment, so we can keep spam out.

DeepSeek V4 Pro FAQ

Try DeepSeek V4 Pro yourself

Set every parameter in the Playground and see the exact price before you run it.

$1.98 per 1M mixed tokens (3 input : 1 output)

  • Three glass discs stacked in the dark, crossed by a streak of cyan light, with a thin gold spark rising beneath them

    Grok 4.7

    Pick Grok 4.7 for uncensored roleplay and fiction that must work with no jailbreak; skip it for long chapters per turn or long agent loops.

    Spicy Index
    78.2
    Freedom Score
    100.0

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review
  • Warm golden light streaks passing through a row of translucent blue glass panels on a dark pedestal

    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

    Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for cheap, whole-document reads and a 384,000-token ceiling; add a system prompt to steady intimate scenes (L4).

    Spicy Index
    81.9
    Freedom Score
    90.4

    Tested Sep 26, 2026

    Read the review
  • A burst of golden light filaments fanning low across a shallow glass dish against pure black

    Grok 4.3

    Pick Grok 4.3 for a huge context window, a genuine reasoning off switch and uncensored writing at a low price; skip it if you need file uploads.

    Spicy Index
    77.0
    Freedom Score
    98.9

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review