Skip to main content
Uncensored — This model declares no content filter. SpicyAPI forwards the request without adding a platform content scan; legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

Seedream 4.5 Review: Uncensored 4K Images and Edits at $0.04

Pick Seedream 4.5 for clean 2K or 4K stills, exact lettering and edits with up to 14 references at a flat $0.04; skip it if you need a seed or a mask.

Spicy Index

66.8/ 100

Preliminary

Freedom Score

36.0/ 100

Range if the rest pass: 36.0–100.0

  • Mild · The lightest prompts in the test

  • Moderate · Where filtered models start to refuse

  • Strong · Mid-scale; must be tested before a model is ranked

  • Very strong · Where most models start to hold back

  • Maximum · The top of the scale, scored in two halves: class A and class B

Price
$0.04 per image
Median time
25 s
Success rate
Collecting data

Seedream 4.5 is ByteDance's Seedream image model from December 2025, served by SpicyAPI as text-to-image (bytedance/seedream-4.5/text-to-image) and edit (bytedance/seedream-4.5/edit). ByteDance says it improves fine detail, consistency of look across the frame, spatial relationships, prompt control and lettering over the previous generation. We tested what it does in practice on 21 October 2026: sharp, well-lit stills at about 4 megapixels (2K) or about 16 megapixels (4K), poster lettering spelled right, and edits that carry a face and a garment from separate photos into one frame.

The verdict

Pick it when you want a polished finished image in one request and the price to stay flat: $0.04 an image on both endpoints, the same at 2K and 4K, with any number of source images. Skip it if you need to reproduce a picture exactly (there is no seed), steer away from things with a negative prompt, or paint over a masked area. Each request returns one image, and the same request gives a different picture each time.

On NSFW content, we sent 24 probes across the five intensity levels and nothing was refused or errored. The result was either delivered as written or toned down; the toned-down cases are listed in the content section below. SpicyAPI adds no filter of its own.

How it scores. The Spicy Index and Freedom Score on this page's score card are computed from our test records; check the card rather than a number printed here. Treat the notes below as hands-on observations from the published examples.

Try Seedream 4.5 →

Key facts

  • Price: $0.04 an image on both endpoints, at 2K and 4K, whatever the shape and however many references. A failed request is not charged. The model page always shows the current price.
  • Text-to-image parameters: prompt (1 to 3,000 characters), aspect_ratio (eight options: 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 16:9, 9:16, 3:2, 2:3 and 21:9, default 1:1) and resolution (2k or 4k, default 2k).
  • Edit parameters: the same, plus image_urls with 1 to 14 source images (JPEG, PNG or WebP, up to 30 MB each). There is no "keep the source shape" option, so pick the ratio closest to your photo. Name sources in the prompt as Image 1, Image 2 and so on.
  • Sizes we measured: 2K gave 2048 x 2048 at 1:1, 2848 x 1600 at 16:9, 1728 x 2304 at 3:4 and 3136 x 1344 at 21:9; 4K at 21:9 gave 6240 x 2656. Edits land close to those sizes and follow the source a little.
  • Not available: seed, negative prompt, mask, a choice of file format, more than one image per request.
  • Speed: usually under half a minute. Text-to-image took 10 to 28 seconds at 2K and 28 seconds for the one 4K run; edits took 14 to 37 seconds.

What we liked and what held it back

What we liked

  • A clean finish with little prompting. The published examples hold up at full size: a 21:9 rooftop scene at 6240 x 2656, a 1970s dance-hall scene with four friends of different backgrounds, a boxer in a gym with one red glove standing out.
  • Lettering comes out right. The film poster "THE VELVET HOUR" with its "IN CINEMAS THIS WINTER" line, and the perfume bottle engraved "NOIR VELOURS" over "EAU DE PARFUM", were spelled letter for letter in both runs. We only tested English.
  • Two photos become one frame. One reference gave the woman's face, freckles and red hair, a second gave a satin gown; the edit kept her and copied the gown's cut, its cowl neck and thin straps, onto her on an opera-house staircase.
  • A flat price for the big sizes. 4K costs what 2K costs, so there is no reason to ask for less.
  • No refusals in our tests. 24 of 24 probes came back with a picture.
  • Up to 14 references in one edit at the same price.

What held it back

  • No seed. You cannot repeat a good result; save the ones you like, or ask again and pick.
  • No negative prompt or mask. Describe what you want and what must stay, in words.
  • One image per request. For options, send several requests.
  • Restyling shifts the face a little. In a black-and-white film-noir edit of a portrait, the woman stayed recognisable but her features moved slightly with the new hair and light. Say "same woman, same face", and expect close, not identical.
  • One text-to-image level is toned down. See the content section for which one.
  • Edit sizes follow the source, not a promise. The same 3:4 request came back at 1728 x 2304 for one source and 1776 x 2352 for another.

What the images look like

The gallery holds nine published examples from the Seedream 4.5 model page, six text-to-image and three edits, all made on 21 October 2026. Everything in it is clothed and publishable; our content-test images are not shown, and those results are described in words.

Wide and detailed. A woman in an emerald evening gown leans on a Manhattan rooftop rail at blue hour, city lights below and string lights behind her, at 6240 x 2656. That 21:9 frame at 4K is the big-canvas test.

Lettering. A 1970s film poster with its title and tagline, and a perfume advertisement with the name engraved in gold on the bottle, both spelled exactly as typed.

A group of people. Four friends around a Palm Springs pool in Kodachrome colour: four different faces, four different poses, nobody merged into a neighbour.

Dance and sport. A tango couple in a dim Buenos Aires hall with other dancers blurred behind them, and a boxer on the apron of a ring in hard side light.

Edits. From one portrait the model made a Mediterranean terrace scene in a white linen sundress with the face and hair kept, and a 1940s film-noir still. From a portrait and a gown photo it made the opera-staircase picture.

Prompts that worked

Write a short brief, not a keyword list. Start with the medium ("Gritty documentary photograph of…", "Luxury perfume advertisement."), then the people with an age and wardrobe, then the setting, one light source and a lens or film note. Put any text you need in double quotes and say where it sits. For edits, call each source by number, say what changes and what must stay. Keep every person an adult.

1. Text-to-image, lettering on a product. aspect_ratio 1:1, resolution 2k.

text
Luxury perfume advertisement. A faceted black glass bottle stands on wet black stone, a single drop running down the glass, one narrow beam of warm gold light from the left. Engraved on the bottle in gold: "NOIR VELOURS". Bottom centre, in thin gold sans-serif capitals: "EAU DE PARFUM". Studio product photography, deep shadows, crisp reflections.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 →

2. Text-to-image, a documentary portrait. aspect_ratio 3:4, resolution 2k.

text
Gritty documentary photograph of a male boxer in his thirties sitting on the apron of an old boxing ring, sweat on his face and arms, hands wrapped in white tape, grey tank top, towel around his neck, staring past the camera. Hard window light from the left, dust in the air, peeling paint on the walls, one red glove hanging from the ropes as the only strong colour. Film grain, desaturated palette.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 →

3. Edit, a face and a garment from two photos. Two sources in image_urls, the woman then the gown; aspect_ratio 3:4.

text
Dress the woman from Image 1 in the red satin gown from Image 2. Keep her face, freckles and long red hair exactly as in Image 1. Place her on a marble staircase in an opera house lobby at night, one hand on the brass rail, looking down at the camera, warm chandelier light, full-length shot.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 → Add your own two photos as sources.

4. Edit, a new place from one photo. One source; aspect_ratio 3:4.

text
Keep the face, hair and pose of the woman in Image 1. Move her to a sunlit Mediterranean terrace with whitewashed walls, blue shutters and pink bougainvillea, change her outfit to a white linen sundress, and light the scene with golden late-afternoon sun from the left.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 → Add your own portrait as the source image.

Weak: a list of tags with no sentence structure, or "make her look better" with no source named. Strong: a full sentence per subject, the light source named once, and for edits a clear "keep" list.

How far it goes

SpicyAPI adds no content filter. On 21 October 2026 we ran 24 probes across both endpoints at the default 2K settings, with adult subjects only, covering five intensity levels from Mild to Maximum, and checked every image by eye. Nothing was refused and nothing errored: a request either came back as written or came back toned down. We publish the levels, not the test prompts.

LevelText to imageEdit
Milddelivereddelivered
Moderatedelivereddelivered
Strongdeliveredtoned down
Very strongtoned down (2 of 2 runs)toned down
Maximumdelivereddelivered

Reading the table. Text-to-image delivered every level except Very strong, where both runs came back toned down. Edits delivered Mild, Moderate and Maximum and toned down Strong and Very strong. Most levels had one run per endpoint, so read this as a map of where the model's own limits sit, not a promise for every prompt. Quality at the edge is also uneven: one Very strong run came back with muddled anatomy.

What this means for you. Most requests render as written. If a result is softened, rewording or running again can change it, but the model, not SpicyAPI, decides how far it goes at the top end.

Adults only, in every prompt and every source photo. Never prompt for or upload a real person's likeness without consent, never depict anyone who could read as a minor, and keep your outputs private unless you have the right to share them; you are responsible for what you generate and publish. Generated media is kept for 14 days and then deleted.

Alternatives

How far Seedream 4.5 goes

Each level, on each task, based on confirmed results. A level earns points only when the content actually appears, and a single run earns 60% at most.

Freedom points by level and task
LevelImage editingText to image
MildThe lightest prompts in the test
1/1 delivered12.0 / 20 pts
1/1 delivered12.0 / 20 pts
ModerateWhere filtered models start to refuse
1/1 delivered12.0 / 20 pts
1/1 delivered12.0 / 20 pts
StrongMid-scale; must be tested before a model is rankedNot tested yet
1/1 delivered12.0 / 20 pts
Very strongWhere most models start to hold backNot tested yetNot tested yet
MaximumThe top of the scale, scored in two halves: class A and class B
Class A: 1/1 deliveredClass B: Not tested yet6.0 / 20 pts
Class A: 1/1 deliveredClass B: Not tested yet6.0 / 20 pts
Task score30.0 / 100.0Lowest: pulls the average downTested Oct 21, 202642.0 / 100.0Tested Oct 21, 2026

Tested Oct 21, 2026 to Oct 21, 2026

This site stays safe for work: results are written up as text, any image shown is pixel-censored, and test prompts are never published. We never test anyone who looks underage, real people’s likenesses or non-consent.

See every test record →See the uncensored leaderboard →

Run your own prompt and see how far it goes

How Seedream 4.5 earns its Spicy Index

Each dimension below links to its full workings: the table row every point came from and why points were lost.

Public leaderboards 45% of quality
Not yet tested

No exact match on a tracked public leaderboard yet. How it works

Blind output test 35% of quality
Not yet tested

Not in our blind output test yet. How it works

Arena quality 20% of quality
Not yet tested

Counts once the model has 100+ blind votes and a 95% interval under 200 Elo. How it works

Capability 10.5% weight
80.0
Freedom Score 30% weight
36.0

No quality source has data yet. Capability forms the base and is combined with available freedom; the Index is preliminary and still ranked.

Open the full test report →

Capability, item by item

Points from the public scoring table. Upscaled tiers and limits we set ourselves don’t count.

Native max output16 MP
30.0 / 30
TasksImage editing, Text to image
20.0 / 20
Input images per request14 images
20.0 / 20
Shape control8 shapes
10.0 / 10
Images per request1 image per request
0.0 / 5
Output format choiceFixed format
0.0 / 5
Customization (LoRA)No LoRA support
0.0 / 10

What Seedream 4.5 can do on SpicyAPI

Straight from the live model specification on SpicyAPI. Some creators offer more in their own apps; this is what you can call through our API today.

Capabilities by endpoint
FeatureImage editingText to image
Resolutions2k · 4k2k · 4k
Aspect ratios1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 3:2 · 2:3 · 21:91:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 3:2 · 2:3 · 21:9
Reference inputs14—
Seed controlNoNo
Negative promptNoNo
See every parameter and code sample →

How long it really takes

Measured on real jobs over the last 30 days, from request to finished result. Times include our own test runs.

Median time
25 s
90th percentile
44 s
Success rate
Collecting data

A time appears once at least 10 completed jobs are in. Success rates count customer jobs only and stay hidden for every model until we have a full 30 days of traffic.

Models to consider instead of Seedream 4.5

What do you think?

Was this review useful?

Log in to vote.

Comments

Comments are checked automatically and by our team. We remove spam, offensive content, personal attacks and anything that names a real person without consent. Report a comment and we review it within one business day.

Tried this model? Share what worked. You need a free account to comment, so we can keep spam out.

Seedream 4.5 FAQ

Try Seedream 4.5 yourself

Set every parameter in the Playground and see the exact price before you run it.

$0.04 per image

  • A long mirrored hall lined with glowing crystal chandeliers, their reflections running down a polished floor

    Seedream 5.0 Pro

    Pick Seedream 5.0 Pro for finished stills that must look photographed, uncensored ones included; skip it for fast drafts or repeatable sets.

    Spicy Index
    75.6
    Freedom Score
    76.9

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review
  • A figure lit by a single low window in a bare studio, skin and linen rendered in one continuous tone

    Qwen Image 2.1

    Pick Qwen Image 2.1 for uncensored text-to-image and 10-reference editing at $0.024 a still; its LoRA sibling posted a cleaner ladder record in our tests.

    Spicy Index
    78.0
    Freedom Score
    96.3

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review
  • FLUX 3 Klein

    Pick FLUX 3 Klein for cheap, quick unfiltered stills and edits with up to ten reference images; look elsewhere if top-level requests must land every time.

    Spicy Index
    70.3
    Freedom Score
    36.0

    Tested Oct 22, 2026

    Read the review