Pular para o conteúdo principal

Esta análise ainda não está disponível em Português (Brasil), então você está lendo o original em English.

Sem censura — Este modelo declara não aplicar filtro de conteúdo. A SpicyAPI encaminha a solicitação sem adicionar uma análise de conteúdo da plataforma; as obrigações legais e de consentimento continuam com o cliente.

Seedream 4.5 Review: Uncensored 4K Images and Edits at $0.04

Pick Seedream 4.5 for clean 2K or 4K stills, exact lettering and edits with up to 14 references at a flat $0.04; skip it if you need a seed or a mask.

Spicy Index

66,8/ 100

Preliminar

Freedom Score

36,0/ 100

Faixa se o resto passar: 36,0–100,0

  • Leve · Os prompts mais leves do teste

  • Moderado · Onde os modelos com filtro começam a recusar

  • Forte · No meio da escala; precisa ser testado antes de um modelo ser ranqueado

  • Muito forte · Onde a maioria dos modelos começa a se conter

  • Máximo · O topo da escala, pontuado em duas metades: classe A e classe B

Preço
US$ 0,04 por imagem
Tempo mediano
25 s
Taxa de sucesso
Coletando dados

Seedream 4.5 is ByteDance's Seedream image model from December 2025, served by SpicyAPI as text-to-image (bytedance/seedream-4.5/text-to-image) and edit (bytedance/seedream-4.5/edit). ByteDance says it improves fine detail, consistency of look across the frame, spatial relationships, prompt control and lettering over the previous generation. We tested what it does in practice on 21 October 2026: sharp, well-lit stills at about 4 megapixels (2K) or about 16 megapixels (4K), poster lettering spelled right, and edits that carry a face and a garment from separate photos into one frame.

The verdict

Pick it when you want a polished finished image in one request and the price to stay flat: $0.04 an image on both endpoints, the same at 2K and 4K, with any number of source images. Skip it if you need to reproduce a picture exactly (there is no seed), steer away from things with a negative prompt, or paint over a masked area. Each request returns one image, and the same request gives a different picture each time.

On NSFW content, we sent 24 probes across the five intensity levels and nothing was refused or errored. The result was either delivered as written or toned down; the toned-down cases are listed in the content section below. SpicyAPI adds no filter of its own.

How it scores. The Spicy Index and Freedom Score on this page's score card are computed from our test records; check the card rather than a number printed here. Treat the notes below as hands-on observations from the published examples.

Try Seedream 4.5 →

Key facts

  • Price: $0.04 an image on both endpoints, at 2K and 4K, whatever the shape and however many references. A failed request is not charged. The model page always shows the current price.
  • Text-to-image parameters: prompt (1 to 3,000 characters), aspect_ratio (eight options: 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 16:9, 9:16, 3:2, 2:3 and 21:9, default 1:1) and resolution (2k or 4k, default 2k).
  • Edit parameters: the same, plus image_urls with 1 to 14 source images (JPEG, PNG or WebP, up to 30 MB each). There is no "keep the source shape" option, so pick the ratio closest to your photo. Name sources in the prompt as Image 1, Image 2 and so on.
  • Sizes we measured: 2K gave 2048 x 2048 at 1:1, 2848 x 1600 at 16:9, 1728 x 2304 at 3:4 and 3136 x 1344 at 21:9; 4K at 21:9 gave 6240 x 2656. Edits land close to those sizes and follow the source a little.
  • Not available: seed, negative prompt, mask, a choice of file format, more than one image per request.
  • Speed: usually under half a minute. Text-to-image took 10 to 28 seconds at 2K and 28 seconds for the one 4K run; edits took 14 to 37 seconds.

O que gostamos e o que atrapalhou

O que gostamos

  • A clean finish with little prompting. The published examples hold up at full size: a 21:9 rooftop scene at 6240 x 2656, a 1970s dance-hall scene with four friends of different backgrounds, a boxer in a gym with one red glove standing out.
  • Lettering comes out right. The film poster "THE VELVET HOUR" with its "IN CINEMAS THIS WINTER" line, and the perfume bottle engraved "NOIR VELOURS" over "EAU DE PARFUM", were spelled letter for letter in both runs. We only tested English.
  • Two photos become one frame. One reference gave the woman's face, freckles and red hair, a second gave a satin gown; the edit kept her and copied the gown's cut, its cowl neck and thin straps, onto her on an opera-house staircase.
  • A flat price for the big sizes. 4K costs what 2K costs, so there is no reason to ask for less.
  • No refusals in our tests. 24 of 24 probes came back with a picture.
  • Up to 14 references in one edit at the same price.

O que atrapalhou

  • No seed. You cannot repeat a good result; save the ones you like, or ask again and pick.
  • No negative prompt or mask. Describe what you want and what must stay, in words.
  • One image per request. For options, send several requests.
  • Restyling shifts the face a little. In a black-and-white film-noir edit of a portrait, the woman stayed recognisable but her features moved slightly with the new hair and light. Say "same woman, same face", and expect close, not identical.
  • One text-to-image level is toned down. See the content section for which one.
  • Edit sizes follow the source, not a promise. The same 3:4 request came back at 1728 x 2304 for one source and 1776 x 2352 for another.

What the images look like

The gallery holds nine published examples from the Seedream 4.5 model page, six text-to-image and three edits, all made on 21 October 2026. Everything in it is clothed and publishable; our content-test images are not shown, and those results are described in words.

Wide and detailed. A woman in an emerald evening gown leans on a Manhattan rooftop rail at blue hour, city lights below and string lights behind her, at 6240 x 2656. That 21:9 frame at 4K is the big-canvas test.

Lettering. A 1970s film poster with its title and tagline, and a perfume advertisement with the name engraved in gold on the bottle, both spelled exactly as typed.

A group of people. Four friends around a Palm Springs pool in Kodachrome colour: four different faces, four different poses, nobody merged into a neighbour.

Dance and sport. A tango couple in a dim Buenos Aires hall with other dancers blurred behind them, and a boxer on the apron of a ring in hard side light.

Edits. From one portrait the model made a Mediterranean terrace scene in a white linen sundress with the face and hair kept, and a 1940s film-noir still. From a portrait and a gown photo it made the opera-staircase picture.

Prompts that worked

Write a short brief, not a keyword list. Start with the medium ("Gritty documentary photograph of…", "Luxury perfume advertisement."), then the people with an age and wardrobe, then the setting, one light source and a lens or film note. Put any text you need in double quotes and say where it sits. For edits, call each source by number, say what changes and what must stay. Keep every person an adult.

1. Text-to-image, lettering on a product. aspect_ratio 1:1, resolution 2k.

text
Luxury perfume advertisement. A faceted black glass bottle stands on wet black stone, a single drop running down the glass, one narrow beam of warm gold light from the left. Engraved on the bottle in gold: "NOIR VELOURS". Bottom centre, in thin gold sans-serif capitals: "EAU DE PARFUM". Studio product photography, deep shadows, crisp reflections.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 →

2. Text-to-image, a documentary portrait. aspect_ratio 3:4, resolution 2k.

text
Gritty documentary photograph of a male boxer in his thirties sitting on the apron of an old boxing ring, sweat on his face and arms, hands wrapped in white tape, grey tank top, towel around his neck, staring past the camera. Hard window light from the left, dust in the air, peeling paint on the walls, one red glove hanging from the ropes as the only strong colour. Film grain, desaturated palette.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 →

3. Edit, a face and a garment from two photos. Two sources in image_urls, the woman then the gown; aspect_ratio 3:4.

text
Dress the woman from Image 1 in the red satin gown from Image 2. Keep her face, freckles and long red hair exactly as in Image 1. Place her on a marble staircase in an opera house lobby at night, one hand on the brass rail, looking down at the camera, warm chandelier light, full-length shot.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 → Add your own two photos as sources.

4. Edit, a new place from one photo. One source; aspect_ratio 3:4.

text
Keep the face, hair and pose of the woman in Image 1. Move her to a sunlit Mediterranean terrace with whitewashed walls, blue shutters and pink bougainvillea, change her outfit to a white linen sundress, and light the scene with golden late-afternoon sun from the left.

Run this prompt on Seedream 4.5 → Add your own portrait as the source image.

Weak: a list of tags with no sentence structure, or "make her look better" with no source named. Strong: a full sentence per subject, the light source named once, and for edits a clear "keep" list.

How far it goes

SpicyAPI adds no content filter. On 21 October 2026 we ran 24 probes across both endpoints at the default 2K settings, with adult subjects only, covering five intensity levels from Mild to Maximum, and checked every image by eye. Nothing was refused and nothing errored: a request either came back as written or came back toned down. We publish the levels, not the test prompts.

LevelText to imageEdit
Milddelivereddelivered
Moderatedelivereddelivered
Strongdeliveredtoned down
Very strongtoned down (2 of 2 runs)toned down
Maximumdelivereddelivered

Reading the table. Text-to-image delivered every level except Very strong, where both runs came back toned down. Edits delivered Mild, Moderate and Maximum and toned down Strong and Very strong. Most levels had one run per endpoint, so read this as a map of where the model's own limits sit, not a promise for every prompt. Quality at the edge is also uneven: one Very strong run came back with muddled anatomy.

What this means for you. Most requests render as written. If a result is softened, rewording or running again can change it, but the model, not SpicyAPI, decides how far it goes at the top end.

Adults only, in every prompt and every source photo. Never prompt for or upload a real person's likeness without consent, never depict anyone who could read as a minor, and keep your outputs private unless you have the right to share them; you are responsible for what you generate and publish. Generated media is kept for 14 days and then deleted.

Alternatives

Até onde Seedream 4.5 vai

Cada nível, em cada tarefa, com base em resultados confirmados. Um nível só pontua quando o conteúdo realmente aparece, e uma única execução rende no máximo 60%.

Pontos Freedom por nível e tarefa
NívelEdição de imagemTexto para imagem
LeveOs prompts mais leves do teste
1/1 entregues12,0 / 20 pts
1/1 entregues12,0 / 20 pts
ModeradoOnde os modelos com filtro começam a recusar
1/1 entregues12,0 / 20 pts
1/1 entregues12,0 / 20 pts
ForteNo meio da escala; precisa ser testado antes de um modelo ser ranqueadoAinda não testado
1/1 entregues12,0 / 20 pts
Muito forteOnde a maioria dos modelos começa a se conterAinda não testadoAinda não testado
MáximoO topo da escala, pontuado em duas metades: classe A e classe B
Classe A: 1/1 entreguesClasse B: Ainda não testado6,0 / 20 pts
Classe A: 1/1 entreguesClasse B: Ainda não testado6,0 / 20 pts
Nota da tarefa30,0 / 100,0A mais baixa: puxa a média para baixoTestado em 21 de out. de 202642,0 / 100,0Testado em 21 de out. de 2026

Testado de 21 de out. de 2026 a 21 de out. de 2026

Este site se mantém seguro para o trabalho: os resultados são escritos em texto, qualquer imagem exibida é pixelizada e os prompts de teste nunca são publicados. Nunca testamos quem aparente ser menor de idade, a imagem de pessoas reais ou a falta de consentimento.

Ver todos os registros de teste →Ver a classificação sem censura →

Teste seu próprio prompt e veja até onde ele vai

Como Seedream 4.5 conquista seu Spicy Index

Cada dimensão abaixo leva ao cálculo completo: a linha da tabela de onde veio cada ponto e por que pontos foram perdidos.

Rankings públicos 45% da qualidade
Ainda não testado

Ainda sem correspondência exata nos rankings públicos que acompanhamos. Como funciona

Teste às cegas de resultados 35% da qualidade
Ainda não testado

Ainda não passou pelo nosso teste às cegas de resultados. Como funciona

Qualidade na arena 20% da qualidade
Ainda não testado

Passa a contar quando o modelo tiver pelo menos 100 votos às cegas e um intervalo de 95% com largura inferior a 200 Elo. Como funciona

Capacidade Peso de 10,5%
80,0
Freedom Score Peso de 30%
36,0

Nenhuma fonte de qualidade tem dados ainda. As capacidades formam a base combinada com a liberdade disponível; o Index é preliminar e continua classificado.

Abrir o relatório de teste completo →

Capacidade, item por item

Pontos da tabela pública de pontuação. Níveis obtidos por ampliação e limites definidos por nós não contam.

Saída nativa máxima16 MP
30,0 / 30
TarefasEdição de imagem, Texto para imagem
20,0 / 20
Imagens de entrada por solicitação14 imagens
20,0 / 20
Controle de formato8 formatos
10,0 / 10
Imagens por solicitação1 imagem por solicitação
0,0 / 5
Escolha do formato de saídaFormato fixo
0,0 / 5
Personalização (LoRA)Sem suporte a LoRA
0,0 / 10

O que Seedream 4.5 faz na SpicyAPI

Direto da especificação atual do modelo na SpicyAPI. Alguns criadores oferecem mais nos próprios apps; estas são as funções que você pode usar pela nossa API hoje.

Capacidades por endpoint
RecursoEdição de imagemTexto para imagem
Resoluções2k · 4k2k · 4k
Proporções de tela1:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 3:2 · 2:3 · 21:91:1 · 4:3 · 3:4 · 16:9 · 9:16 · 3:2 · 2:3 · 21:9
Entradas de referência14—
Controle de seedNãoNão
Prompt negativoNãoNão
Ver todos os parâmetros e exemplos de código →

Quanto tempo leva de verdade

Medido em trabalhos reais dos últimos 30 dias, da solicitação ao resultado final. Os tempos incluem nossos próprios testes.

Tempo mediano
25 s
Percentil 90
50 s
Taxa de sucesso
Coletando dados

Um tempo aparece quando há pelo menos 10 trabalhos concluídos. As taxas de sucesso contam só trabalhos de clientes e ficam ocultas para todos os modelos até completarmos 30 dias de tráfego.

Modelos para considerar no lugar de Seedream 4.5

O que você acha?

Esta análise foi útil?

Entre na sua conta para votar.

Comentários

Os comentários passam por verificação automática e pela nossa equipe. Removemos spam, conteúdo impróprio, ataques pessoais e qualquer coisa que cite uma pessoa real sem consentimento. Denuncie um comentário e analisamos em até um dia útil.

Já testou este modelo? Conte o que funcionou. É preciso ter uma conta gratuita para comentar, assim mantemos o spam longe.

Perguntas frequentes sobre Seedream 4.5

Teste Seedream 4.5 você mesmo

Ajuste cada parâmetro no Playground e veja o preço exato antes de rodar.

US$ 0,04 por imagem

  • Uma longa galeria de espelhos com lustres de cristal acesos, cujos reflexos correm por um piso polido

    Seedream 5.0 Pro

    Seedream 5.0 Pro para imagens finais que precisam parecer fotografadas, sem censura inclusive; não para rascunhos rápidos nem séries repetíveis.

    Spicy Index
    75,6
    Freedom Score
    76,9

    Testado em 24 de set. de 2026

    Ler a análise
  • Uma figura iluminada por uma única janela baixa em um estúdio vazio, pele e linho renderizados em um único tom contínuo

    Qwen Image 2.1

    O Qwen Image 2.1 é ideal para texto em imagem sem censura e edição com 10 referências a partir de $0.024; sua versão LoRA teve histórico mais limpo nos testes.

    Spicy Index
    78,0
    Freedom Score
    96,3

    Testado em 24 de set. de 2026

    Ler a análise
  • FLUX 3 Klein

    Pick FLUX 3 Klein for cheap, quick unfiltered stills and edits with up to ten reference images; look elsewhere if top-level requests must land every time.

    Spicy Index
    70,3
    Freedom Score
    36,0

    Testado em 22 de out. de 2026

    Ler a análise