Skip to main content
Filtered — This model refuses requests beyond its own limits outright. Measured, not assumed — models we have not measured carry no label at all.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst Review: Portrait Edits

Choose Sunburst for portrait edits with clear fabric, color and preservation instructions.

Create in StudioOpen the Playground

Spicy Index

62.1/ 100

Freedom Score

6.0/ 100

Range if the rest pass: 6.0–31.0

Content levels

Tested 5 of 6 probe types · 20 runs

  • Mild · The lightest prompts in the test

  • Moderate · Where filtered models start to refuse

  • Strong · Mid-scale; must be tested before a model is ranked

  • Very strong · Where most models start to hold back

  • Maximum · The top of the scale, scored in two halves: class A and class B

Price
$0.00182 per image
Median time
78 s
Success rate
Collecting data

Choose Sunburst when you want to direct a portrait edit with explicit instructions about fabric, color and what should remain. The existing crimson-gown output shows a seated adult in burgundy satin with black lace sleeves. It supports a useful creative example; it does not establish that Sunburst is always sharper or faster than another model.

What GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst made in our tests

Straight from our test runs. Copy a prompt or open it in the playground to try it yourself.

  • Image editing

    Change the black velvet gown in Image 1 to a deep crimson satin gown that keeps the same long lace sleeves. Keep her face, hair, lipstick, pose, the carved chair, the backdrop and the single key light exactly as they are.

    Try this model

Make your own with GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

Create in StudioOpen the Playground

The verdict

What we liked and what held it back

What we liked

  • Creation and editing share a family, so a finished portrait can become the starting point for a revision.
  • The published gown example has visible satin folds and a distinct lace pattern.

What held it back

  • All seven archived content probes were refused.
  • This review has no matched speed study against Flare.
  • Requested resolution and quality must be checked in the live quote.

What the existing result shows

The gallery shows the actual crimson-gown model output. The face, chair and dark portrait setting remain recognizable in the published edit, while the dress is burgundy and its sleeves remain lace. Keep an editing brief narrow: name the garment change and the features you want preserved. Examine fine texture at the delivered size before approving a final; the example alone does not prove preservation across repeated edits.

A prompt from the published example

text
Change the black velvet gown to a deep crimson satin gown that keeps the same long lace sleeves. Keep her face, hair, lipstick, pose, the carved chair, the backdrop and the single key light exactly as they are.

Use it with its corresponding source image from the model editing page.

Content tests and their limits

The 29–30 September archive contains seven runs covering suggestive, partial and full-level requests across creation and editing; all were refused. The new partial artistic-portrait request is one observation, not a broad pass-rate study. Explicit activity, restraint and gore are not covered by independent probes in this set. The platform adds no safety checker, but that does not remove the model's limits. Consult the current test report for the measured coverage.

See the current test report.

How far GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst goes

Each level, on each task, based on confirmed results. A level earns points only when the content actually appears, and a single run earns 60% at most.

Freedom points by level and task
LevelImage editingText to image
MildThe lightest prompts in the test
3/5 delivered12.0 / 20 pts
0/5 delivered0.0 / 20 pts
ModerateWhere filtered models start to refuseNot tested yet
0/1 delivered0.0 / 20 pts
StrongMid-scale; must be tested before a model is ranked
0/1 delivered0.0 / 20 pts
0/4 delivered0.0 / 20 pts
Very strongWhere most models start to hold back
0/2 delivered0.0 / 20 pts
0/1 delivered0.0 / 20 pts
MaximumThe top of the scale, scored in two halves: class A and class B
Class A: 0/1 deliveredClass B: Not tested yet0.0 / 20 pts
Not tested yet
Task score12.0 / 42.0Tested Oct 5, 20260.0 / 20.0Lowest: pulls the average downTested Oct 5, 2026

Tested Sep 29, 2026 to Oct 5, 2026

This site stays safe for work: results are written up as text, any image shown is pixel-censored, and test prompts are never published. We never test anyone who looks underage, real people’s likenesses or non-consent.

See every test record →See the uncensored leaderboard →

Run your own prompt and see how far it goes

Create in StudioOpen the Playground

How GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst earns its Spicy Index

Each dimension below links to its full workings: the table row every point came from and why points were lost.

Public leaderboards 45% of quality
90.0
Blind output test 35% of quality
79.5
Arena quality 20% of quality
Not yet tested

Counts once the model has 100+ blind votes and a 95% interval under 200 Elo. How it works

Capability 10.5% weight
90.0
Freedom Score 30% weight
6.0
Open the full test report →

Capability, item by item

Points from the public scoring table. Upscaled tiers and limits we set ourselves don’t count.

Native max output16 MP
30.0 / 30
TasksImage editing, Text to image
20.0 / 20
Input images per request16 images
20.0 / 20
Shape control15 shapes
10.0 / 10
Images per request10 images per request
5.0 / 5
Output format choice3 formats
5.0 / 5
Customization (LoRA)No LoRA support
0.0 / 10

Arena rating: 1187 (95% interval 1007–1330); votes are still coming in.

What GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst can do on SpicyAPI

Straight from the live model specification on SpicyAPI. Some creators offer more in their own apps; this is what you can call through our API today.

Capabilities by endpoint
FeatureImage editingText to image
Resolutions1k · 2k · 4k1k · 2k · 4k
Aspect ratios1:1 · 1:2 · 1:3 · 2:1 · 2:3 · 3:1 · 3:2 · 3:4 · 4:3 · 4:5 · 5:4 · 9:16 · 9:21 · 16:9 · 21:91:1 · 1:2 · 1:3 · 2:1 · 2:3 · 3:1 · 3:2 · 3:4 · 4:3 · 4:5 · 5:4 · 9:16 · 9:21 · 16:9 · 21:9
Reference inputs16—
Output formatspng · jpeg · webppng · jpeg · webp
Seed controlNoNo
Negative promptNoNo
See every parameter and code sample →

How long it really takes

Measured on real jobs over the last 30 days, from request to finished result. Times include our own test runs.

Median time
78 s
90th percentile
3.3 min
Success rate
Collecting data

A time appears once at least 10 completed jobs are in. Success rates count customer jobs only and stay hidden for every model until we have a full 30 days of traffic.

What do you think?

Was this review useful?

Log in to vote.

Comments

Comments are checked automatically and by our team. We remove spam, offensive content, personal attacks and anything that names a real person without consent. Report a comment and we review it within one business day.

Tried this model? Share what worked. You need a free account to comment, so we can keep spam out.

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst FAQ

Try GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst yourself

Generate in Studio in a few clicks, or set every parameter in the Playground and see the exact price before you run it.

$0.00182 per image

More reviews

See the leaderboards →
  • A long mirrored hall lined with glowing crystal chandeliers, their reflections running down a polished floor

    Seedream 5.0 Pro

    Pick Seedream 5.0 Pro for finished stills that must look photographed, uncensored ones included; skip it for fast drafts or repeatable sets.

    Spicy Index
    75.6
    Freedom Score
    76.9

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review
  • A figure lit by a single low window in a bare studio, skin and linen rendered in one continuous tone

    Qwen Image 2.1

    Pick Qwen Image 2.1 for uncensored text-to-image and 10-reference editing at $0.024 a still; its LoRA sibling posted a cleaner ladder record in our tests.

    Spicy Index
    78.0
    Freedom Score
    96.3

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review
  • A pale sculptural ring and a curved red strip

    Seedream 5.0 Flash

    Choose Flash for creation and reference edits; its independent quality evidence remains preliminary.

    Spicy Index
    73.9
    Freedom Score
    62.2

    Tested Sep 30, 2026

    Read the review