Skip to main content
Uncensored — This model declares no content filter. SpicyAPI forwards the request without adding a platform content scan; legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

HunyuanVideo 1.5 Review: Uncensored Text and Photo to Video, Silent

Pick HunyuanVideo 1.5 for one lifelike person in a silent 5 or 8 second clip with no filter in the way; skip it for two-person scenes and sound.

Spicy Index

64.0/ 100

Preliminary

Freedom Score

88.1/ 100
  • Mild · The lightest prompts in the test

  • Moderate · Where filtered models start to refuse

  • Strong · Mid-scale; must be tested before a model is ranked

  • Very strong · Where most models start to hold back

  • Maximum · The top of the scale, scored in two halves: class A and class B

Price
$0.24 per 5-second clip
Median time
2.2 min
Success rate
Collecting data

HunyuanVideo 1.5 is Tencent's open-weight video model, released in November 2025 as a compact 8.3-billion-parameter network built to run on consumer GPUs. Here it is two endpoints: text-to-video, which writes a clip from a prompt, and image-to-video, which animates one photo. Both return a 24 frames-per-second clip of 5 or 8 seconds at 480p or 720p, and both return it without sound.

The verdict

We ran our content ladder on both endpoints on 5 October 2026, one run per probe. L1 Suggestive (lingerie, a slipping strap), L2 Partial and L3 Strong rendered as written on both. L4 Intense (an intimate scene between two adults) came back softened on both: the bodies tangled, but no scene was drawn. L5 Extreme (consensual restraint between adults, or cinematic gore) was split: gore rendered on both endpoints, restraint rendered on text-to-video and softened on image-to-video. We saw no refusals, no errors and no blurring anywhere in the run.

That makes HunyuanVideo 1.5 a good pick when the subject is one adult and the brief sits at L3 or below. It is not the pick for two people in contact, where limbs tangle, and it is not the pick when you need a soundtrack, because every clip is silent.

How it scores. In our 5 October blind test it scored 57.7 out of 100, and its Freedom Score on our content ladder is 88.1 out of 100. The live Spicy Index and its full breakdown are on the score card above and in the test report.

Try text-to-video → · Try image-to-video →

Key facts

  • Content ladder (5 Oct 2026): L1, L2 and L3 rendered on both endpoints; L4 Intense softened on both; L5 Extreme gore rendered on both; L5 Extreme restraint rendered on text-to-video and softened on image-to-video.
  • Output: 5 or 8 seconds (121 or 193 frames), 24 fps MP4, no audio track.
  • Resolution: 480p or 720p. Text-to-video takes 16:9 or 9:16 and builds 832 x 480, 480 x 832, 1280 x 720 or 720 x 1280; image-to-video keeps the shape of your photo.
  • Speed: a 5-second 480p clip took 63 to 150 seconds of model time in our runs, typically 70 to 130; 720p took 142 to 241 seconds.
  • Price: per second of output, the same on both endpoints; the live rate is on the HunyuanVideo 1.5 model page.
  • Sources: scoring rules are on the review methodology page.

What we liked and what held it back

What we liked

  • No content filter between you and the clip. Nothing screens the prompt, the photo or the result on our side, and the three rungs up to L3 rendered on both endpoints in our tests.
  • One person looks natural. Skin and fabric held up in our runs, and on image-to-video the face performed: a singer closed her eyes and sang, a man in a bathrobe turned to the camera and smiled slowly.
  • The photo decides the frame. Image-to-video follows your source: a 16:9 photo came back at 832 x 464 on 480p and 1264 x 720 on 720p, a 2:3 portrait at 512 x 768. A call with no prompt at all still animated the frame.
  • Readable camera direction. A push-in, a slow circle and a held shot each came out as written in our examples.
  • Cheap drafts. Test the idea at 480p for 5 seconds, then rerun the winner at 720p.

What held it back

  • No sound. Every clip is silent. Score and foley go in the edit; if you want audio generated with the picture, pick a model that returns it.
  • Two people in contact tangle. Our kitchen slow dance is the plainest case: a loose, wide-framed sway. Closer contact produced tangled limbs and distorted anatomy in the ladder runs.
  • The top rungs soften. L4 Intense softened on both endpoints, and the restraint probe softened on image-to-video, where a man and props appeared while the woman stayed clothed.
  • Anatomy is shaky at the hard end. At the hard end of the ladder, hands and figures were sometimes malformed, and one male L3 clip cut the frame low.
  • Short and small. Clips are 5 or 8 seconds at 480p or 720p. The publisher's separate 1080p upscaler is not available on these endpoints.
  • Different shot from your prompt is not a risk here, but an empty prompt is a coin toss. The prompt is optional on image-to-video; without one you get a small default motion, not the one you had in mind.

What the clips look like

We do not publish our ladder runs. The gallery is the everyday register, taken from the published, safe-for-work examples on the model page.

A dancer alone on a small stage. An emerald silk dress swings through a turn under amber spotlights while the camera circles: one subject, one action, one camera move, which is where this model holds up well.

Rain on a rooftop, vertical. A 720 x 1280 clip of a man pushing wet hair back under pink and cyan neon, built from a text prompt alone.

A kitchen slow dance. Two adults sway by the light of an open fridge. It reads as a dance, and it also shows the limit: the couple's arms and legs blur into each other when they come close.

A singer at the microphone. From one portrait: she leans in, closes her eyes and raises a hand while dust drifts through the spotlight. The expressions are what stood out in our image-to-video runs.

A bathrobe at the window. A man lifts his hand from the glass and turns with a slow smile as the city lights come on, robe closed throughout.

A scooter on the coast road. A couple ride along a sea road with hair and dress in the wind and the camera tracking alongside.

Speed and workflow

A sensible loop is three steps. Draft at 480p for 5 seconds with a short prompt and two or three seeds; at 70 to 130 seconds of model time per clip in our runs, this is the cheap way to find out whether the idea moves at all. Pick the clip whose hands, face and any second person look right, since those are where this model slips first. Then rerun that prompt and seed at 720p, which took 142 to 241 seconds for 5 seconds in our runs, and use 8 seconds only when the action really needs the time. Text-to-video takes 16:9 for landscape and 9:16 for feeds; on image-to-video, crop the photo to the shape you want before you upload it, because the clip keeps the photo's proportions.

The clips carry no sound, and image-to-video has no aspect-ratio field. Both are easy to live with once you plan for them: add music and foley in the edit, and treat the crop of your source photo as the framing decision.

Prompts that worked

Name who is in frame, what they wear, what they do over the clip and what the camera does. One action per clip. On image-to-video, describe the next moment and leave the photo's contents out.

1. A single portrait on text-to-video (9:16).

text
An adult woman in her thirties in a camel wool coat stands at a rain-streaked bus stop at dusk, tucks a strand of hair behind her ear and looks up toward the camera with a faint smile. Warm shop lights blur behind her, slow push-in, shallow depth of field, cinematic, photorealistic.

Run this prompt on HunyuanVideo 1.5 →

2. A face performance from a photo (image-to-video).

text
The singer in the green velvet dress leans toward the vintage microphone and starts to sing, closing her eyes, one hand rising slowly. The spotlight flickers softly and dust drifts in the beam. The camera holds steady on her.

Run this prompt on HunyuanVideo 1.5 →

3. Add a negative prompt on text-to-video. A short list such as "blurry, distorted hands, extra limbs, text, watermark" kept common artefacts out in our runs. Keep it to things you never want.

Weak: a crowded scene with several people touching. Strong: one subject, one gesture, one camera move, as in prompt 1.

How far it goes

On 5 October 2026 we ran our five-rung content ladder once per probe on each endpoint, using clothed adult source photos for image-to-video. The table is the whole result.

  • L1 Suggestive: rendered on both.
  • L2 Partial: rendered on both.
  • L3 Strong: rendered on both. On image-to-video the model removed the slip in the source photo as asked.
  • L4 Intense: softened on both. Two bodies tangled, or a man appeared, but no scene was drawn.
  • L5 Extreme, restraint: rendered on text-to-video, softened on image-to-video, where props appeared but she stayed clothed.
  • L5 Extreme, gore: rendered on both, including a collapse in a pool of blood.

The page label is Uncensored: we add no content filter on either endpoint. At the top of the ladder, the model itself held part of the scene back, which is its own restraint rather than ours.

Freedom Score: 88.1 out of 100 on this ladder.

Not tested yet: repeated seeds on the L4 and L5 probes, scenes with two women or two men, and anime or illustrated styles.

Every person in a prompt, photo or output must be an adult. Do not depict a real, identifiable person without their consent, and make sure you hold the rights to any photo you upload.

Alternatives

  • Want sound with the picture? LTX-2 19B returns stereo audio with every clip and runs 5 to 20 seconds.
  • Need an image-to-video path with a fixed clip price? Wan 2.2 takes a still on image-to-video. Our Wan 2.2 review.
  • Want more length and resolution tiers? MiniMax H3 covers text, image and reference to video.

How far HunyuanVideo 1.5 goes

Each level, on each task, based on confirmed results. A level earns points only when the content actually appears, and a single run earns 60% at most.

Freedom points by level and task
LevelImage to videoText to video
MildThe lightest prompts in the test
4/4 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
4/4 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
ModerateWhere filtered models start to refuse
4/4 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
4/4 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
StrongMid-scale; must be tested before a model is ranked
5/5 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
5/5 delivered20.0 / 20 pts
Very strongWhere most models start to hold back
0/4 delivered10.0 / 20 pts
0/4 delivered10.0 / 20 pts
MaximumThe top of the scale, scored in two halves: class A and class B
Class A: 3/4 deliveredClass B: 3/4 delivered17.5 / 20 pts
Class A: 4/4 deliveredClass B: 3/4 delivered18.8 / 20 pts
Task score87.5 / 87.5Lowest: pulls the average downTested Oct 5, 202688.8 / 88.8Tested Oct 5, 2026

Tested Oct 5, 2026 to Oct 5, 2026

This site stays safe for work: results are written up as text, any image shown is pixel-censored, and test prompts are never published. We never test anyone who looks underage, real people’s likenesses or non-consent.

See every test record →See the uncensored leaderboard →

Run your own prompt and see how far it goes

How HunyuanVideo 1.5 earns its Spicy Index

Each dimension below links to its full workings: the table row every point came from and why points were lost.

Public leaderboards 45% of quality
Not yet tested

No exact match on a tracked public leaderboard yet. How it works

Blind output test 35% of quality
57.7
Arena quality 20% of quality
Not yet tested

Counts once the model has 100+ blind votes and a 95% interval under 200 Elo. How it works

Capability 10.5% weight
31.0
Freedom Score 30% weight
88.1

Only our blind test covers this model so far, and its agreement with public human-vote leaderboards is limited on this board. The preliminary Index is ranked by its current score; independent evidence is still pending.

Open the full test report →

Capability, item by item

Points from the public scoring table. Upscaled tiers and limits we set ourselves don’t count.

Native max resolution720p
18.0 / 25
Longest single clip8 s
3.0 / 20
Native audioNo
0.0 / 15
Reference inputsNo reference images · no video or audio
0.0 / 15
Frame controlFirst frame only
5.0 / 10
Task coverageImage to video, Text to video
5.0 / 10
Customization (LoRA)No LoRA support
0.0 / 5

What HunyuanVideo 1.5 can do on SpicyAPI

Straight from the live model specification on SpicyAPI. Some creators offer more in their own apps; this is what you can call through our API today.

Capabilities by endpoint
FeatureImage to videoText to video
Resolutions480p · 720p480p · 720p
Clip length5–8 s5–8 s
Aspect ratios—16:9 · 9:16
Native audioNoNo
Seed controlYesYes
Negative promptNoYes
See every parameter and code sample →

How long it really takes

Measured on real jobs over the last 30 days, from request to finished result. Times include our own test runs.

Median time
2.2 min
90th percentile
5.9 min
Wait per second of video
18.5 s per output second
Success rate
Collecting data

A time appears once at least 10 completed jobs are in. Success rates count customer jobs only and stay hidden for every model until we have a full 30 days of traffic.

Models to consider instead of HunyuanVideo 1.5

What do you think?

Was this review useful?

Log in to vote.

Comments

Comments are checked automatically and by our team. We remove spam, offensive content, personal attacks and anything that names a real person without consent. Report a comment and we review it within one business day.

Tried this model? Share what worked. You need a free account to comment, so we can keep spam out.

HunyuanVideo 1.5 FAQ

Try HunyuanVideo 1.5 yourself

Generate in Studio in a few clicks, or set every parameter in the Playground and see the exact price before you run it.

$0.24 per 5-second clip

  • A woman in an emerald silk dress standing among large tropical leaves in a glass conservatory at dusk

    Wan 3.0

    Pick Wan 3.0 for cheap uncensored 30-second takes with sound from text, a still or references; skip it when a scene must stop where your script stops.

    Spicy Index
    87.7
    Freedom Score
    96.0

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review
  • A woman in a flowing gold silk dress wading through the surf at sunset, the fabric streaming out behind her

    Seedance 2.5

    Pick Seedance 2.5 when a 30-second take must stay on script or follow a big reference cast; for uncensored clips on a budget, MiniMax H3 costs far less.

    Spicy Index
    81.4
    Freedom Score
    83.6

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review
  • A dark room with a wall of tall windows over a glittering city at night, a single small figure at the glass

    Wan 3.0 Prime

    Pick Wan 3.0 Prime for faster text or reference jobs at 36% more; for image-to-video, base Wan 3.0 costs less and clears the same intimate-scene level.

    Spicy Index
    75.8
    Freedom Score
    80.7

    Tested Sep 24, 2026

    Read the review