Skip to main content

Model comparisons

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiMo V2.6 Flash bills 53% less than MiniMax M3.1 Flash per million output tokens. Tier prices, request fields and limits side by side.

MiMo V2.6 Flash

MiMo V2.6 Flash API brings Xiaomi’s high-frequency professional model to meeting digests, document extraction and mixed-media inboxes, with a 1,048,576-token input budget and text replies up to 131,072 tokens.

View model details →View sample outputs →

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash API combines a 1,000,000-token input window with image and video understanding for coding agents; reasoning_effort changes thinking depth without switching models. For M3.1 Flash tool loops, preserve the complete assistant response, including reasoning content and tool calls, then return execution results with the matching tool_call_id; your application remains responsible for validation and execution.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Compare

The short answer

Start with the input you have, the result you want and your budget. These are the differences that affect that choice.

  • MiMo V2.6 Flash costs 53% less per million output tokens. Compare the input and cache rates below for longer conversations.

Compare the published examples, then try the same input on both models with matching settings.

Test scores side by side

The Spicy Index and Freedom Score for both models, from the same daily calculation as the leaderboards.

Test scores side by side
MeasureMiMo V2.6 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Spicy Index76.273.6
Freedom ScoreNot yet testedNot yet tested
Evidence——
Range if the rest pass——
Price$0.175 per 1M mixed tokens (3 input : 1 output)$0.263 per 1M mixed tokens (3 input : 1 output)
ReviewsRead the MiMo V2.6 Flash reviewRead the MiniMax M3.1 Flash review

Preliminary · freedom evidence pending

See both on the leaderboard →

Current price

Price at the same setting

A start price answers a different question than the one you have. These are the tiers both models publish, matched setting for setting, in US dollars per billed unit with no conversion step in between.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

Price at the same setting
TierMiMo V2.6 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashDifference
Input$0.14 / 1 million tokens$0.15 / 1 million tokensMiMo V2.6 Flash −6%
Cached input$0.0028 / 1 million tokens$0.015 / 1 million tokensMiMo V2.6 Flash −81%
Output$0.28 / 1 million tokens$0.6 / 1 million tokensMiMo V2.6 Flash −53%

What one ordinary job costs

  • MiMo V2.6 Flash: $0.196 for one million input and two hundred thousand output tokens.
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash: $0.27 for one million input and two hundred thousand output tokens.

Arithmetic on the published rates at each model's own default setting, not a quote. The console prices your actual settings before a request is accepted.

About this comparison

Controls and limits

Every row here is read from the JSON Schema the endpoint validates against, so it matches what the API will really accept rather than a feature list written by hand.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

MiMo V2.6 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Controls and limitsMiMo V2.6 FlashMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Supported taskschatchat
Input context1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Maximum output131,072 tokens524,288 tokens
Tool callingYesYes
ExecutionSynchronous, with streamingSynchronous, with streaming
Request timeout10 minutes10 minutes
AvailabilityLiveLive

Can I swap the model ID without changing the request body?

Request body, field by field

The task lifecycle is shared; the body is not. Each endpoint publishes its own JSON Schema and the API validates against that, so this is the list to reconcile before a switch.

  • 8 fields appear in both request bodies under the same names. stop, tools, messages, max_tokens, tool_choice, response_format, reasoning_effort, parallel_tool_calls
  • Only MiMo V2.6 Flash accepts: top_p, temperature.
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash accepts no field the other one lacks.
  • MiMo V2.6 Flash requires messages.
  • MiniMax M3.1 Flash requires messages.
  • Both reject unknown fields outright, so a parameter left over from the other model comes back as a validation error instead of being quietly ignored.

How to choose

How to choose

Maximum output

MiniMax M3.1 Flash can return more in one reply: up to 524,288 tokens against the other model's ceiling.

Input context

MiMo V2.6 Flash takes the longer prompt: up to 1,048,576 input tokens in a single request.

Compare

Moving from one to the other

The model identifiers are xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash/chat and minimax/m3.1-flash/chat, and both go in the same field of the same request.

Both return the response on the chat request. With streaming enabled, read the stream until it finishes; there is no media task to poll.

Both use the same submit-and-track flow, but their required inputs may differ. Check each model page before switching.

One key, one balance, one set of spend caps. Both bill to the same account in US dollars, and the per-key daily, monthly and lifetime limits apply to whichever one you call.

Questions developers ask

Which is cheaper, MiMo V2.6 Flash or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Which is cheaper, MiMo V2.6 Flash or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiMo V2.6 Flash costs 53% less per million output tokens. Compare the input and cache rates below for longer conversations. Prices may change; check the estimate shown for your actual settings before submitting.

How long can a single request run?

MiMo V2.6 Flash allows 10 minutes per task and MiniMax M3.1 Flash allows 10. Those are ceilings rather than typical times — most requests finish far sooner — but they are what your own client timeout has to survive.

Prices and capabilities shown here come from the current public model catalogue. Check each model page for its latest inputs and examples.