Skip to main content

Model comparisons

Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0 Pro Prime

Seedance 2.5 or Wan 3.0 Pro Prime, tier by tier: matched prices, request fields, limits and the content policy measured on each.

Seedance 2.5

ByteDance's Seedance 2.5 image-to-video starts the clip on a still you supply and animates it, with sound in the same pass. Clips run 4 to 30 seconds at 480p, 720p or 1080p, and an optional closing still makes the shot arrive on a set frame.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Wan 3.0 Pro Prime

Wan 3.0 Pro Prime image-to-video animates an opening frame at 1080p, 2K or 4K for 2 to 30 seconds, with generated audio. An optional last frame fixes the ending, and 2K and 4K are enlarged from a native 1080p render.

View model details →View sample outputs →

Compare

The short answer

Start with the input you have, the result you want and your budget. These are the differences that affect that choice.

  • The two bill on different tiers, so there is no like-for-like row: Seedance 2.5 starts at $0.123 / output seconds and Wan 3.0 Pro Prime at $0.234 / output seconds.
  • Both are listed as Uncensored. Compare the examples and content-test details on each model page for the scenes you want to create.

Compare the published examples, then try the same input on both models with matching settings.

Test scores side by side

The Spicy Index and Freedom Score for both models, from the same daily calculation as the leaderboards.

Test scores side by side
MeasureSeedance 2.5Wan 3.0 Pro Prime
Spicy Index81.474.8
Freedom Score83.684.7
EvidenceTested 5 of 6 probe types · 46 runsTested 5 of 6 probe types · 45 runs
Range if the rest pass83.6–98.984.7–100.0
Price$1.39 per 5-second clip$1.17 per 5-second clip
ReviewsRead the Seedance 2.5 reviewRead the Wan 3.0 Pro Prime review

Preliminary · limited independent quality evidence

See both on the leaderboard →

Current price

Price at the same setting

A start price answers a different question than the one you have. These are the tiers both models publish, matched setting for setting, in US dollars per billed unit with no conversion step in between.

These two bill on different tiers, so there is no row to line up. Each one's own published tiers are listed here instead.

Seedance 2.5: no audio · 480p $0.123 / output seconds · with audio · 480p $0.123 / output seconds · no audio · 720p $0.277 / output seconds · with audio · 720p $0.277 / output seconds · no audio · 1080p $0.682 / output seconds · with audio · 1080p $0.682 / output seconds

Wan 3.0 Pro Prime: 1080p $0.234 / output seconds · 2K $0.252 / output seconds · 4K $0.279 / output seconds

What one ordinary job costs

  • Seedance 2.5: $1.39 for a five-second clip at with audio · 720p.
  • Wan 3.0 Pro Prime: $1.17 for a five-second clip at 1080p.

Arithmetic on the published rates at each model's own default setting, not a quote. The console prices your actual settings before a request is accepted.

About this comparison

Controls and limits

Every row here is read from the JSON Schema the endpoint validates against, so it matches what the API will really accept rather than a feature list written by hand.

Swipe horizontally to compare all fields.

Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0 Pro Prime
Controls and limitsSeedance 2.5Wan 3.0 Pro Prime
Supported tasksimage-to-videoimage-to-video
Clip length4–30 seconds2–30 seconds
Resolution tiers480p · 720p · 1080p1080p · 2K · 4K
Aspect ratiosadaptive16:9 · 4:3 · 1:1 · 3:4 · 9:16 · adaptive
Audio outputYesYes
High-resolution tierNoYes
SeedYesYes
ExecutionSubmit, then poll or take the callbackSubmit, then poll or take the callback
Request timeout180 minutes180 minutes
AvailabilityLiveLive

Do low-filter models allow every request?

Content policy, side by side

Two separate facts sit behind these labels. The first is what we do, which is nothing: no platform content filter, and no maturity flag to set on a request. The second is what each model does on its own, and that is the only part that varies between these two.

Seedance 2.5

Uncensored

This model declares no content filter. SpicyAPI forwards the request without adding a platform content scan; legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

Usage note Use consenting adults and licensed material only. No minors, no non-consensual intimate imagery, no deceptive impersonation of real people.

Wan 3.0 Pro Prime

Uncensored

This model declares no content filter. SpicyAPI forwards the request without adding a platform content scan; legal and consent duties remain with the customer.

Use these content labels to shortlist models, then open each model page for available examples and content-test details.

The label never changes your obligations. Age, consent, real-person likeness and the law where you operate stay with you, and SpicyAPI does not inspect each request.

Can I swap the model ID without changing the request body?

Request body, field by field

The task lifecycle is shared; the body is not. Each endpoint publishes its own JSON Schema and the API validates against that, so this is the list to reconcile before a switch.

  • 8 fields appear in both request bodies under the same names. aspect_ratio, duration_seconds, generate_audio, image_url, last_image_url, prompt, resolution, seed
  • Only Seedance 2.5 accepts: enable_web_search, output_format, return_last_frame, watermark.
  • Only Wan 3.0 Pro Prime accepts: enable_prompt_expansion.
  • Seedance 2.5 requires image_url.
  • Wan 3.0 Pro Prime requires image_url.
  • Both reject unknown fields outright, so a parameter left over from the other model comes back as a validation error instead of being quietly ignored.

How to choose

How to choose

High-resolution delivery

Wan 3.0 Pro Prime supports a high-resolution option.

Compare

Moving from one to the other

The model identifiers are bytedance/seedance-2.5/image-to-video and alibaba/wan-3.0-pro-prime/image-to-video, and both go in the same field of the same request.

Both run the same way: submit the task, then poll it or take the callback. Queueing and retry logic carry over unchanged.

Both use the same submit-and-track flow, but their required inputs may differ. Check each model page before switching.

One key, one balance, one set of spend caps. Both bill to the same account in US dollars, and the per-key daily, monthly and lifetime limits apply to whichever one you call.

Questions developers ask

Which is cheaper, Seedance 2.5 or Wan 3.0 Pro Prime?

Which is cheaper, Seedance 2.5 or Wan 3.0 Pro Prime?

The two bill on different tiers, so there is no like-for-like row: Seedance 2.5 starts at $0.123 / output seconds and Wan 3.0 Pro Prime at $0.234 / output seconds. Prices may change; check the estimate shown for your actual settings before submitting.

How long can a single request run?

Seedance 2.5 allows 180 minutes per task and Wan 3.0 Pro Prime allows 180. Those are ceilings rather than typical times — most requests finish far sooner — but they are what your own client timeout has to survive.

Prices and capabilities shown here come from the current public model catalogue. Check each model page for its latest inputs and examples.

Related comparisons